login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Help us translate Steam


I can't fault a publisher for trying to protect their sales but leaving Denuvo in beyond the initial sales window (2.5 years now for JC3!?) is just frustrating your customers unnecessarily and potentially pushing them to the exact behaviour they are trying to avoid.
Games from GOG are very much personal licences that you purchase specifically "for your personal enjoyment". They are very much limited.. it's basically the same as Steam but without DRM. It's also the same for movie and music purchases and has been for a long time.
Don't get me wrong, I'm a fan of GOG but I've heard this before and it just ain't the case:
https://support.gog.com/hc/en-us/articles/212632089-User-Agreement
Also, regarding games being supposedly just licenses that you don't own: that's how software companies would like the system to work, but they can put whatever they want in their EULA, courts will ultimately decide if the 10 pages of gibberish everyone clicks through without reading is legally binding. And in many cases, they've ruled it's not: https://www.engadget.com/2012/07/03/eu-court-rules-its-legal-to-resell-digital-games-software/
I predict we'll get proper rulings on the issue when someone dies and wants to leave his Steam collection to his child (or split the games among his children), and Valve tries to deny it.