Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
this series looks like a lot of fun, unforunately lazy UI design and the lack of anything even resembling a proper tutorial has alienated 1000's of new players who bought it and will prevent thousands more from buying it, that can only reduce the size of the community and limit the games obvious potential to break out of the 'niche' bracket and become a well known, well respected mainstream classic.
short sighted and a shame that the learning curve starts with a solid brick wall.
However if you do know about the capabilities of the real life units in question you will end up pissing yourself laughing at the way they have been butchered for this game..it took me several hours to adapt from accurate games to this and i still have moments of regression.
Wildman, you should re-install this game or, better, install European escalation.
As a new player of the former, I think that's the tutorial you're looking for.
I'm playing the solo campaigns for one month and i'm still struggling with the 3rd scenario (Ramstein) of the 3rd campaign (able archer). I also tried to play Airland battle and i went back to European Escalation within 2 days.
Only after 1 month I can reasonably say that I can handle recon, tanks, logistics and infantry in a fairly smooth and efficient way. I still need to learn how to handle and integrate arty and airmobile forces . That's the reason why I think that I'm not ready for the "Air" component of the Airland battle.
Regarding your complain about the UI, well, the only thing is the size of the markers: Despite the wonderful graphics and models of each unit you don't really have time to play this game at max zoom on your beloved platoon of Leopards because you need to play this game with a decent "strategic" view . And , when you're running a reasonable amount of units, the big screen is totally useless. You need to , constantly, zoom-in and out at each of you clustered units areas.
Just like you , I have a very long history of wargaming, back to the tabletop games of Avalon-hill and Victory games (grand strategy/operational /tactical ). In the RTS category, I've played Theatre of War, CoH,MoW and, I have to said that, so far, Wargame is the best.
regards.
Things look very different from that point of view.
I fully agree...Graphics are superb ( I'm running WALB on a high specs desktop and it's really gorgeous). The thing is the zoomed out map. There must be a way to represent the units in a more "visible" way...I´ll even buy some red or blue spots or tiny squares (no need for actual unit type), It's just to have the big picture. I guess that I'm used to strategic games UI and I'm missing the point :)
regards.