login
|
language
Български (Bulgarian)
čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Suomi (Finnish)
Français (French)
Deutsch (German)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Italiano (Italian)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese)
Português-Brasil (Portuguese-Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
Español (Spanish)
Svenska (Swedish)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
ไทย (Thai)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Help us translate Steam
Also, we need to stop talking about using Wine on Steam. Steam's job is to deliver your game, not make it work. If a publisher wants to support a game on Linux with Wine, then they can (Witcher for Mac does this), but Steam's job is not to facilitate your Wine usage, it just wants to put the game on your hard drive.
Ah, see. I didn't know you could already launch steam games directly from the terminal (without the UI), and I figure we can run it in another X-server from there. I still would like a search function directly from the terminal too. I don't really like pulling up any UI unless absolutely necessary. I figured that a lot of linux users would agree with this sentiment. Also, As noted above, the -W flag would use the wine configured by the player. Honestly, I think that the extension is actually a little counter-intuitive, but for the transitioning months (or years), it would be a nice feature.
Also, "man steam" is not providing any of the info necessary to pull up a game alone without the UI. I'll give it a shot in a second and mess around with it a bit. Part of the purpose of the suggestion was to streamline the steam command so it could be more accessible to linux users.