Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Eh, BFF stopped being funny when they started to overuse the noob and exaggerated with his stupidity.
It's more like XVII = 10+5+2 = 17 than whatever that is. Like I said, simple addition.
Err... Did you actually read the post you quoted? You took the hexadecimal number 19 and claimed it's equivalent to the Roman decimal numeral XVII (27) which it isn't. Hexadecimal is a base 16 number system, meaning every major unit is based on a power of 16 the same way every major decimal unit is based a power of 10. The 1 in hex 19 represents 16 in dec and the 7 represents a 7 in dec. 19+7 = 25.
And yes, I uncropped the bit of my post you cropped in your quote for reasons I don't fully understand.
Since when are Roman numerals base 16? Google Roman numerals 1-20 and you'll see XVII=17. I honestly don't know what you're talking about.
At this point im clearly speculating as i dont know as much as i thought on the subject.
It was a hypothetical comparison addressing the notion that "it's just simple addition." Yes, reading Roman Numerals isn't exactly hard, but it isn't exactly convenient, either. My comparison used hexadecilmal because that too is pretty simple to read, but is equally inconvenient. No, roman numnerals are not hexadecimal, which is not a claim I made. But they are inconvenient to use LIKE hexadecimal numbers are to use.
I'm not sure that I agree. Either way, it's a conversion and the number grouping is inconsistent. In XI for instance, the X groups with the I to form 11. In XIV, however, the X stands separate and the IV group together to form a total of 14. Hex might need a bit more math, but at least number grouping is always consistent. Moreover, the math for 0-25 is dirt simple, too. Anything 0-9 dec is the same in hex, 10-15 dec is A-F in hex and everything beyond that in dec is just shifted 6 values back in hex.
But just because I can do that in my head doesn't make it convenient.
When you start having large numbers of dissimilar digits, however, number grouping - whether a digiti is on the left of one or on the right of another - starts getting irritating to figure out at a glance. Unless you already know most of the common roman numerals by heart - which I don't, since I try to avoid using them - then it's still an extra mental step. Not to mention I've always had issues telling VII and VIII apart at a glance, just because the number of lines blend together in my eyesight.
Nobody is claiming that roman numerals are bad or impossible to work with. I am, however, arguing that they're clumsy, cumbersome and bring no benefit whatsoever, other than "Because Infamy started out having Roman Numerals."
Its true...I guess that's why Overkill choose roman numerals instead,i have no complain tho,i just need a mod that convert roman into arabic numerals cuz i believe majority of PD2 player prefer roman numerals...