安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
It looks like it's because there are only four reviews for it, and one of them gave it a 30 so it brought the entire score way down.
I think it depends on what sort of PC game you are talking about. For casual games there's a lot of overlap betwen the PC and mobile. Obviously, if you are looking for a long, involved AAA game then a mobile port is probably not going to be up to your standards but there are a fair amount of people who enjoy casual games on the PC.
Personally, I like a mix of both. I do like longer and more complex games but at the same time sometimes I am not in the mood and/or don't have the time for them and would rather play a more casual game on my PC.
I think there is room for both sorts of games on the PC and I don't really think it's fair to automatically write off a port of a mobile game simple because it started as a mobile game.
I mean I think it's fine if someone criticizes for example the controls or other aspects of the game itself but when I see comments like 'Another cell phone game! This sucks!' etc I don't think that's a valid criticism of the actual game on its own merits.