So is desert kingdoms, the SJW pack?

[Bruce Magician]

More women in politics and army.
All black cultures.

Jokes on you, mainstream. The people who cry for diveristy in video games, dont actually play video games. lol

[-o-]

Oh behave yourself. This is a DLC for people who asked for it, and adds supportable factions in a playable way.

Honestly I hate the SJW thing as much as anyone, but when it comes to this DLC you're just being silly.

[MANWHATADONGA]

What does SJW mean?

[Welsh Dragon]

Originally posted by donaldclarke1:

What does SJW mean?

"Social justice warrior" (commonly abbreviated SJW) is a pejorative term for an individual promoting socially progressive views, including feminism, civil rights, multiculturalism, and identity politics.

Basically it's what some people say when they want to disagree with you but can't come up with a reasonable argument so resort to namecalling.

All the Best,

Welsh Dragon.

EDIT: The idea that promoting civil rights and equality is somehow a bad thing is really mind boggling to me, but it's a funny old world.

[-o-]

Originally posted by donaldclarke1:

What does SJW mean?

It's a pejorative term describing people who shut down good faith debate, attack free expression or harass/slander people with emotive accusations like racism, sexism etc at the drop of a hat, with special emphasis on those who apply their vaunted principles in an inconsistent, dishonest or virtue-signalling manner and delight in wilfully making innocent people feel they have given terrible offence.

Basically people who make a job of taking offence where none was meant, often on behalf of groups they are not part of and/or in patronizing defence of people who did not ask for their dubious "protection".

Some use it to mean "anyone who isn't a bumhead like me", so beware of that, they are the other side of the same coin.

@WD I don't think from your posts you would be an SJW tbh.

[Welsh Dragon]

Originally posted by Uhtred son of Uhtred:

Originally posted by donaldclarke1:

What does SJW mean?

It's a pejorative term describing people who shut down good faith debate, attack free expression or harass/slander people with emotive accusations like racism, sexism etc at the drop of a hat, with special emphasis on those who apply their vaunted principles in an inconsistent, dishonest or virtue-signalling manner and delight in wilfully making innocent people feel they have given terrible offence.

Basically people who make a job of taking offence where none was meant, often on behalf of groups they are not part of and/or in patronizing defence of people who did not ask for their dubious "protection".

Some use it to mean "anyone who isn't a bumhead like me", so beware of that, they are the other side of the same coin.

@WD I don't think from your posts you would be an SJW tbh.

By your definition I'd agree. But I've been accused of it and many other things besides.

All the Best,

Welsh Dragon.

[Dirty Rotten Flieger]

The thing is the avaerage man, with twice the upper boody strength than the average woman, would usually smash her to the ground and kill her with a couple of sword blows.
And history does not have many empires built with women as the rank and file of their armies.

Feminism pretends to pursue equality but it actually pursues female supremicy at the expense of men and histroical fact.

Female generals are another thing.... They did happen in history many times... I can think of a few that were beaten in battle but can't think of any right now that were great winning generals.

SJW would have the truth of historical male military supremecy replaced with lies about gender equality to encourag more girls to become CEO's ...

Biology and evolution had made men and women specialits at differnt and complimentary fields.

[Bass Pro Shops Consumer]

Originally posted by Dirty Rotten Flieger:

The thing is the avaerage man, with twice the upper boody strength than the average woman, would usually smash her to the ground and kill her with a couple of sword blows.
And history does not have many empires built with women as the rank and file of their armies.

Feminism pretends to pursue equality but it actually pursues female supremicy at the expense of men and histroical fact.

Female generals are another thing.... They did happen in history many times... I can think of a few that were beaten in battle but can't think of any right now that were great winning generals.

SJW would have the truth of historical male military supremecy replaced with lies about gender equality to encourag more girls to become CEO's ...

Biology and evolution had made men and women specialits at differnt and complimentary fields.

which is exactly why, the only female units that i know of are archers and generals, factions leaders and such. Besides this update is bringing new features to female leaders so they are actual people not just traits like in other total wars

[Bass Pro Shops Consumer]

Originally posted by Bruce Magician:

More women in politics and army.
All black cultures.

Jokes on you, mainstream. The people who cry for diveristy in video games, dont actually play video games. lol

Faction diversity, new units, new mechanics, "♥♥♥♥ you CA I hate this ♥♥♥♥ for no particular reason other than it adds female leaders and ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ as a faction." Because as we know, women are the most polticily inept things to ever walk the earth, and NEVER would have lead nations using their husbands and proxies, or anything political at all. It would be an issue if they replaced real factions that used only men with fake ones that use only women, they haven't replaced anything bad so its fine.

[Dad]

Will you be able to play as Wakanda??

[Jahkaka]

Why more DLC for Rome 2 though..?

[Bass Pro Shops Consumer]

Originally posted by V73 Jahkaka:

Why more DLC for Rome 2 though..?

are you really complaining about new content and expanded features

[Bruce Magician]

Originally posted by V73 Jahkaka:

Why more DLC for Rome 2 though..?

Rome 2 is probably the last Antiquity era total war game for a long time.

[Lenfer]

Originally posted by Dad:

Will you be able to play as Wakanda??

HAHAHAHAHA WAKANDA , yeah right search the black cat

[Jahkaka]

Originally posted by Lord Castellan:

Originally posted by V73 Jahkaka:

Why more DLC for Rome 2 though..?

are you really complaining about new content and expanded features

Yes. Especially after the last one's lackluster reception.

Why not for Attila? Attila is, subjectively, a better game. I'd rather see new content with the fleshed out mechanics of Attila.

Maybe I missed something but I didn't see any new features. Just another nation pack with different skinned units.

[Welsh Dragon]

Originally posted by V73 Jahkaka:

Originally posted by Lord Castellan:

are you really complaining about new content and expanded features

Yes. Especially after the last one's lackluster reception.

Why not for Attila? Attila is, subjectively, a better game. I'd rather see new content with the fleshed out mechanics of Attila.

Maybe I missed something but I didn't see any new features. Just another nation pack with different skinned units.

Because Rome 2 is consistently the game played by far more people, has sold better, and is well liked by a good many people. That's not to say Attila doesn't have its fans too, just that they went with the bigger playerbase this time.

The DLC brings four new playable factions, which isn't to everybodies tastes, but for players like me represents a lot of content, gameplay hours and enjoyment. (I play almost entirely singleplayer campaigns, and I'm not really much of a mod user.)

It also pays for the work going into the accompanying Free-DLC (details can be found here at the bottom: https://www.totalwar.com/blog/total-war-rome-ii-desert-kingdoms ) and patch (no details yet, but there should be one.)

Hope that helps.

All the Best,

Welsh Dragon.