Batman™: Arkham Knight

Batman™: Arkham Knight

Ver estadísticas:
Batman Arkham Knight by Ubisoft
This wasn't a RockSteady Release at ALL IT WAS UBERSOFT NOT ROCK OR STEADY
< >
Mostrando 1-6 de 6 comentarios
r-2 9 AGO 2015 a las 6:20 
lol also dont forget EA...;)
Billcimus 9 AGO 2015 a las 6:45 
This is worse than anything buy those companies.
Yagyu 9 AGO 2015 a las 6:54 
Cant disagree
Damien Azreal 9 AGO 2015 a las 7:16 
Publicado originalmente por SquireEwokonTitan:
This is worse than anything buy those companies.

Matter of opinion.
But... even with all it's problems, I had far more fun playing Arkham Knight then I did trudging through Watch_Dogs. Or any recent Assassin's Creed... or Capcom's wonderfully amazing PC version of Dead Rising 3.

It's Weskin time 9 AGO 2015 a las 7:33 
Publicado originalmente por Damien Azreal:
Publicado originalmente por SquireEwokonTitan:
This is worse than anything buy those companies.

Matter of opinion.
But... even with all it's problems, I had far more fun playing Arkham Knight then I did trudging through Watch_Dogs. Or any recent Assassin's Creed... or Capcom's wonderfully amazing PC version of Dead Rising 3.
Nah man the thing that pisses me off is that Rocksteady CAN and DOES Better than this them in terms of game if it was something like Ubersoft or Crapcom i might be like meh...and forget it till the nets update but Rocksteady i had genuine faith in it cause it never gave any wrongs for the most part BUT THIS was just aweful but i will admit when the game managed to WORK properly i did have an enjoyable experience and i am anxious to replay it with all the updated features and i await for the dlcs to come out seperately all and all its a really fun game and from Rocksteady based on the batman games i honestly found them to be Masterpieces if it was a sold out company i might have not even cared Remember Assassins'Creed Unity uuugh that was a DISASTER pc port and when i heard how bad it was my first response was CALLED IT , But Arkham knight recived even Hype from Nvidia so i thought hey this seems awesome when it worked very poorly won't lie i was DEVASTATED but it was just so fun to play even with its problems I much agree on that Flying around Gotham as batman was waaay more fun than going around as either Arno on framy france and going around watch dogs 's trail of LIES.
Damien Azreal 9 AGO 2015 a las 9:01 
In reality, all the Arkham games have had problems upon release on PC. Because Rocksteady is a console focused developer.
They've openly admitted in the past that the consoles are were they are most comfortable, and the platform they know the best.

I had faith in them delivering a great Batman experience. Which, they did. I did have concerns in the condition of the PC version considering the last one Rocksteady did they delivered with broken DX11 support and horrible performance that took them over six months to "fix" with udpates.
Only to discover that they didn't even do the PC version of this one. Instead, WB made the decision to outsource to the team that did the PC port of Origins.

Ultimately, crap happens. Yes, annoyed... but even so, I played and finished Arkham Knight. And enjoyed it. The problems are irritating, and I look forward to replaying it once it's updated... but, doesn't change the fact that under the problems, it's still a great game.
And, I can't say that for Watch_Dogs, Dead Rising 3 or AC:Unity. Those are all... pretty... awful.
Combined with them all being shoddy PC ports...
< >
Mostrando 1-6 de 6 comentarios
Por página: 1530 50

Publicado el: 9 AGO 2015 a las 5:59
Mensajes: 6