Is there AI art in the game?

[M.Y.K]

True question, i screenshoot something, confirm me (and don't insult the devs)

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3469816263

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3469816382

[Shadeborn]

I asked GROG and ChatGPT + few other AIs about is this AI art. They answered it is 100% ai art.

[stakanctl]

There's no such thing as AI art. AI-generated content only.

[Rithoo]

Publicado originalmente por Q.T. Brewer:

Publicado originalmente por Genesis:

No, Steam requires games with AI art to include disclaimers as to how and where they were used and there's no such disclaimer on this game's page

lmao

The number of games that don't follow this on this platform is massive, Valve doesn't regulate a damn thing.

When it comes to devs ignoring rules like that on steam, unfortunently the only way to handle it is players reporting it to get the listing changed.

I highly doubt Valve has anywhere near the employees needed to manualy play and check every single game that gets put up on steam daily, let alone check every corner, the numbers are insane. Lord forbid it's some 200+ hour rpg. That's not happening before it releases.

They could use some sort of automatic software to scan through games in theory, but I don't know anything about that sort of technology or it's viability. I'd be shocked if that sort of thing wouldn't constantly come up with false positoves and get games that don't use AI struck.

[Caz]

Publicado originalmente por RhinoBarbarian:

Publicado originalmente por Axelhander:

Even if there is, who cares.

Because AI 'art' is theft. Simple as that.

Wrong.

Publicado originalmente por Rithoo:

Publicado originalmente por Axelhander:

Even if there is, who cares.

A bunch of people on the internet are still deeply obsessed with this sort of thing because they never bothered to pay attention to history. This is going the same way as the printing press and photoshop. The general consumer base is not going to care how a product was made as long as it satisfies them, as it's always been. Loud vocal minoritys online won't change that.

It's too useful as a time saving and money making tool, so theres no way in hell it's going anywhere. It's already deeply rooted into common use in many business' nowadays.

What people should be pushing for is something actually realistic, like regulation, so componys can't just say, copy and steal the voices of voice acters for example. I can agree that's pretty immoral and wrong.

But instead they want to focus on weird background texture imagry in random video games that could have been formated from a bunch of royalty free images/art for all we know. I'm sure that'll go places.

Thank the gods someone understands. I've been saying this since the start of this whole AI freak out. It blows my mind how people are so unaware of history that they don't know this same type of thing has happened multiple times already, many of them in the last two centuries alone.

[Luckiernut]

No one cares

[Eraziell]

Publicado originalmente por Luckiernut:

No one cares

[bshock]

Who cares?

[Meowjin]

I don't care at all about people wanting to use AI to ease workloads and stuff of that sort, using it to substitute what would usually be flavor for the environment seems kind of ew though

[InsertCoin]

and so if it is? why do we care? the game is beautiful

[Magic Lewis]

You guys don't care about this now, but give it time and the percentage of AI slop in games will go up and up. These patterns of anti-consumer practices getting worse over time because people don't take a stand should be big enough red flags but I guess most can't see the bigger picture. They haven't declared it on steam either and that too is concerning enough as it is.

[Arestris]

Publicado originalmente por Magic Lewis:

You guys don't care about this now, but give it time and the percentage of AI slop in games will go up and up. These patterns of anti-consumer practices getting worse over time because people don't take a stand should be big enough red flags but I guess most can't see the bigger picture. They haven't declared it on steam either and that too is concerning enough as it is.

You guys don't care about it now .. but I tell you, this new thing, called "wheel", it's bad .... UNGA!!!

[Magic Lewis]

Publicado originalmente por Arestris:

Publicado originalmente por Magic Lewis:

You guys don't care about this now, but give it time and the percentage of AI slop in games will go up and up. These patterns of anti-consumer practices getting worse over time because people don't take a stand should be big enough red flags but I guess most can't see the bigger picture. They haven't declared it on steam either and that too is concerning enough as it is.

You guys don't care about it now .. but I tell you, this new thing, called "wheel", it's bad .... UNGA!!!

Very disingenuous take. It's obvious where this road goes but I guess if they remove ingredients from your food and replace it with sawdust you'll just keep eating and keeping paying until it's too late.

[SoFail]

I think it's AI, but you know what? It's a team of 33 people making a spectacular game, I'd rather them use AI for some textures here and there and focus on more important things to get a great game out.
If this was released by a big publisher, sure, not cool, they have the resources but honestly for a small studio I don't care.

[Burdpal]

Publicado originalmente por Caduryn:

Publicado originalmente por RhinoBarbarian:

Because AI 'art' is theft. Simple as that.

lol....

He's right though. AI art requires existing template to work on top of. That for which being other people's intellectual property. It's ungenuine, and it's theft.

[evandro_uv]

This is a bit of a shame. I had noticed the "33" in some promotional art looked weird, so it was likely used in many other ways too. I'd bet a couple fingers that they used it in model creation/ coding too.

Publicado originalmente por Irx:

Publicado originalmente por RhinoBarbarian:

Because AI 'art' is theft. Simple as that.

Not in general, it depends on what the specific model has been trained on.
Anyway that is definitely AI generated. I personally don't have any problem with AI stuff as long as it is used as a tool and not just used in a final product without any editing. This simply looks poor.

Virtually all models with "ethical" databases have unauthorized images (i.e Adobe's) or tricked people into giving their content (i.e. Capcut).

Only way to make sure on what you're feeding it is if you make a proper screening on your database before feeding it to train the AI.

To the people calling generative AI a tool. It's not a tool. You type a prompt and get a media (image, text, song, etc.) It's greed and theft. They could've paid any artist a few dozen dollars for stuff like these posters or made it themselves in less than a week on photoshop after watching a tutorial.