Dragon Age™: The Veilguard

Dragon Age™: The Veilguard

Преглед на статистиките:
Setting to ignore
I'd gotten used to ignoring a certain amount of modern-dayisms but I'm done. It's gone beyond parody.

I'm not buying anything tainted by activism anymore.
< >
Показване на 16-30 от 41 коментара
Първоначално публикувано от Berries and Cream:
Първоначално публикувано от pr1mus:
didn't you just say you're looking forward to having four react channels confirm your biases? don't try to regurgitate too many of their talking points in the next few days.

keep puttin words in my mouth, another strawman argument, literally thats the only thing you can do, twist other ppls arguments and add irrelevant info.
Im going to enjoy so much how they destroy this game, thats going to be fun and somehow you believe that im relying on them to form an opinion about this game? either reading comprehension issues at hand or malicious attempt to win a discussion by abusing fallacies like those strawman you like to use in every comment.

truth is that this game will be a disaster and youtubers are eager to feed upon the veilguard, as i said ill have popcorns ready.
You keep using that word, I don't think it means what you think it does.
Първоначално публикувано от Berries and Cream:
keep puttin words in my mouth, another strawman argument, literally thats the only thing you can do, twist other ppls arguments and add irrelevant info.
are you doing a bit? did one of them ever mention the word "strawman" and now you're forcing it into conversation because you thought one of them sounded intellectual when they used it? you don't even have an argument to begin with, so what am i strawmanning exactly?

if you're upset that you think i'm misconstruing your words that there's a different for it other than "straw man", right? straw man refers to attacking an argument that is different from someone made, this is not where we're at currently. open a book or something jfc.

Първоначално публикувано от Berries and Cream:
Im going to enjoy so much how they destroy this game
yeah, you're going to watch other people confirm your biases. you've said this several times already.
You are assuming a lot. My views are nowhere near as 2d as you imagine. But your understanding is not important to me.

I think my intent and the reasons for me not purchasing will be clear to Bioware should they read these threads.

There is no need for any of us to be arguing as I have no hostility towards any individual. So I will wish you a heartfelt good life. Kind regards,
Първоначално публикувано от Thorro:
You are assuming a lot. My views are nowhere near as 2d as you imagine. But your understanding is not important to me.

I think my intent and the reasons for me not purchasing will be clear to Bioware should they read these threads.

There is no need for any of us to be arguing as I have no hostility towards any individual. So I will wish you a heartfelt good life. Kind regards,
Are you addressing this to me? Do you hate the quote button?
Първоначално публикувано от Berries and Cream:
its a strawman, period, faulty reasoning and invalid argument
this is the end result of someone who watched streamers on one screen and subway surfers on the other.:steamfacepalm:

Първоначално публикувано от Berries and Cream:
it twist my words and adds relevant info to support your biased narrative.
what relevant info did i add?:steamhappy: buddy what are you doing, your streamers didn't prepare you for this.
Първоначално публикувано от Berries and Cream:
Първоначално публикувано от Sero:
You keep using that word, I don't think it means what you think it does.

want me to give you a link to multiple sites with the definition and explanation of such fallacy? cuz what he did is a strawman, totally, seems like you are the one who doesnt know what im talking about, there are many great sites to learn about fallacies, feel free to read some.
"Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack."

Was that so hard to type out instead of "I could do this and that"?

You don't even make arguments, you only describe actions and leave us to interpret your intentions and motivations. You don't know how to express yourself.

Първоначално публикувано от Berries and Cream:
it twist my words and adds relevant info to support your biased narrative.
what relevant info did i add?:steamhappy: buddy what are you doing, your streamers didn't prepare you for this. [/quote]

Wait, did he actually complain about you adding RELEVANT infos?
Did the meaning of that word change similar to "literaly"?
Последно редактиран от Sero; 22 септ. 2024 в 2:15
Първоначално публикувано от Berries and Cream:
Its going to be a slaughter no doubt.
"Slaughter" meaning that they rag on something that has no way of defending itself, not really engaging with the topic and only repeating the popular talking points of their crowd?
Първоначално публикувано от Berries and Cream:
Първоначално публикувано от Sero:
"Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack."

Was that so hard to type out instead of "I could do this and that"?

You don't even make arguments, you only describe actions and leave us to interpret your intentions and motivations. You don't know how to express yourself.

learn a thing or two, please read the whole article and there are many more related to fallacies
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

As i previously mentioned, im going to enjoy how certain youtubers roast this game, that alone was enough for mr primus to imply to assume that they are some sort of inspiration to me or that i rely on that people to form my own opinion and other irrelevant, absurd unrelated arguments. Now please go back and read those comments then read the wiki article about a strawman rinse and repeat.

Straw man fallacy is the distortion of someone else’s argument to make it easier to attack or refute. Instead of addressing the actual argument of the opponent, one may present a somewhat similar but not equal argument.

By placing it in the opponent’s mouth and then attacking that version of the argument, one is essentially refuting an argument that is different from the one under discussion.


https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/straw-man-fallacy/

you're welcome, im too good at this.

Are you twelve? Why do you keep reperating the same phrases? Why do you keep congratulating yourself?

The fact that you even think that what they say is "funny" implies that you agree with position. You wouldn't laugh about leftist comedians either becasue you'd feel offended, right?
Please direct your "superior intellect" to bandwagon, appeal to authority, appeal to nature, composition/division, burden of proof, ambiguity, genetic and last but not least the fallaca fallacy.

You are not very good at this.
Първоначално публикувано от Berries and Cream:
Moist can cause serious damage with his criticism and most of the time he and asmon or mutahar have a similar opinion.
wow, all three content creators inconspicuously have the same opinion? crazy how react channels manage to be so consistently in toe in all things drama, a mystery surely.:steamhappy:

Първоначално публикувано от Berries and Cream:
As i previously mentioned, im going to enjoy how certain youtubers roast this game, that alone was enough for mr primus to imply to assume that they are some sort of inspiration to me or that i rely on that people to form my own opinion and other irrelevant, absurd unrelated arguments.
you're so close, let me help you grasp the intricacies of what makes a straw man argument. ;)

1. straw man is a misrepresentation of an argument so that one can attack the easier one they've set out for themselves.
2. in your case, you do not have an argument to begin with, you saying you're going to watch streamers confirm your biases is not an argument, you've not set out a proposition or made a case, you only said you're going to do that thing.

you're like missing several ingredients for the straw man recipe, you're making pancake batter without flour and milk.:steamsad:
Първоначално публикувано от vera32_2000:
Първоначално публикувано от Sero:
That is very much about politics. You are also very bitter about the whole thing.
You know you could just let it slide by like so many other games but you feel you need to bite into it, engage with it as much as possible.
The really interesting part about this is if people like you didn't push so hard against people being LGBTQ+ we wouldn't have as many of those in media since they wouldn't feel the need to push to justify their right to exist.

I am guessing since you didn't tell what your grievance is about but this is usually the issue of people who always assume that other people are offended by them.

Oh, please, this is such a bsh..
Millions of people LOVED DAO. They butchered this franchise, now they get what they deserve.
Nobody cares about somebodys sexual life, except they want to be a part of it or the said person feels it is necessary to rub his/her preferences under everybodys nose.

Do I have something against romance option for gay/lesbian? - No.
Do I need them in my game? - also no.
That is why I find that making every companion available to romance for every player is a GREAT decision. Pity this is the only good choice they made.

If the CC allows you to create ONLY trans-looking character it is discrimination and I am not going to support it.
I really would like you t engage with what I posted.
You expressed disagreement, you expressed tolerance of homosexuality, you expressed that you want bigger tits.
I honestly am having trouble to find videos about the range on female bodies.
So far I am most appaled by the qunary redesign.
Последно редактиран от Sero; 22 септ. 2024 в 2:38
Първоначално публикувано от Berries and Cream:
Hilarious, now you are using Ad hominems, as i said im too good at this.

The moment someone resort to fallacies and agressive replies that's when you know they have already lost the discussion. Proof enough in your reply, making an argument about me "r u twelve?" instead of accepting how you and primus abuse strawmans due inability to form decent, logic valid counter-argument. Anyways my argument prevails, its obvious and logical.
This you?
https://preview.redd.it/obvqaa0lhn841.jpg?width=1080&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=00e27fe47ee6ede53e5e0f0a8be0ce6322fe07d4
Първоначално публикувано от Berries and Cream:
Първоначално публикувано от AbyssDemon:

Subscribed to Moist, and SomeOrdinaryGamers - doesn't look like they care. Think they are more focused on actual issues like Nintendo suing Palworld.

As an asmongold fan though, you don't have to wait! : )

Moist can cause serious damage with his criticism and most of the time he and asmon or mutahar have a similar opinion.

Its going to be a slaughter no doubt.

I mean it would be a bit ridiculous if anyone thinks Nintendo is in the right, dare I say, I'd like them to share the same opinion? You don't watch a variety of Youtubers do you? Putting a lot of stock in someone else's power and opinion than your own.
Първоначално публикувано от Valkyria:
Meanwhile us Dragon Age fans will be enjoying the game and having fun.

Dragon age fans will hate this dogsh1t game, it has nothing of dragon age.
Първоначално публикувано от CadaveR:
Първоначално публикувано от Valkyria:
Meanwhile us Dragon Age fans will be enjoying the game and having fun.

Dragon age fans will hate this dogsh1t game, it has nothing of dragon age.

Don't include us in your opinion. Most of us love this game.
Първоначално публикувано от Thorro:
I'd gotten used to ignoring a certain amount of modern-dayisms but I'm done. It's gone beyond parody.

I'm not buying anything tainted by activism anymore.

Posting and engaging with the community doesnt sound like you ignoring the game
< >
Показване на 16-30 от 41 коментара
На страница: 1530 50

Дата на публикуване: 22 септ. 2024 в 1:17
Публикации: 41