Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (испанский Лат. Ам.)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
25 - 30 FPS
What the best game mode minimum lagg ?
Not saying it made sense, or was logical ... but I did get it to work.
Some time ? You realize this is not a new game right ? Arma 2 had the EXACT same horrible problem.
They said flatout back then "we're not going to fix it, it's too much work" .
Instead they just slapped on some new textures and called it "arma 3" .
Im New Arma
Solo mode lagg ?
http://forums.bistudio.com/showthread.php?170597-Warfare-CTI-PERF-Seattle-WA-www-ofps-net&p=2597349#post2597349
This would be more tolerable to me if it was still beta or alpha. Wait two years plus after release to get a half acceptable frame rate on a good rig? That's bad. There's no good way to cut this. The game has potential, and can be fun, but the FPS are a huge deal breaker for me and other people. I'm just glad I bought in when it was cheap, because it was a large disapointment for me personally. The possibility of some real patching in the future is all I look forward too, some better optimization and getting a steady 50 or 60 fps.
But the delivery has been poorly executed. Sorry Arma 3 and fans. I have to speak the truth.