Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
Valve seem to have taken the 'spring cleaning' type approach to moderation (especially in the Concepts section). As in, it's feels like it's something they only both doing once a year.
the owners of a greenlight page can moderate their own comment section to remove such thnigs.
As curious as I was about what projects you were talking about I think you should edit your post and remove that link.
As Skoardy says they seem to have more of a spring cleaning attitude. (they are a bit faster on functional problems though) I assume they simply have their hands full with a lot of things so cleaning out policy violators takes a far way down placement on the priority list.
I've tried communication to no success, so maybe I should look at reporting them.
In at least two cases I've outlined to devs that their submission violates copyright (they're using a title that is already copyrighted) and they've simply deleted my comment without even bothering to address it. Not my problem, if they want to get sued, I don't care.
Another one is more serious. The game is being listed as $20 once off payment for infinite online play (fair enough) but there is also this offer to become a "server partner" for $150 in a kind of MLM-like scheme where they encourage you to onsell the game and DLC. This makes up half of the actual Greenlight description no less.
I don't feel that this kind of merchandising or advertising is a good fit for Greenlight or Steam, and I think that trying to get Steam users to 'invest' in a particular business (as opposed to buying their product) should be discouraged.
They have sunmitted/resubmitted their game three times (annoying enough in itself) and each time I have posted a calm and rational comment or discussion thread asking why they are promoting their MLM scheme so strongly. In each case my question has again been simply deleted without reply.
Discourteous at best, and evidence of shady practice at worst.
(I won't name the game due to forum and Steam rules)
I generally leave a comment *and* report. I figure that if the poster still hasn't seen sense by the time Valve grind into action, they deserve anything they get. I just checked back a few pages and an item that I know I reported (a commercial AAA game that is already on Steam - obvious enough to spot if any staff happened to glance through the listings) is still there. It's been up for over a month. Like I say, sloooooooooooooooooooooooow.
The worse thing about it is it swamps out the real concepts. There's devs in there with some great looking games that certainly deserve attention from Steam users. They're finding themselves shoulder to shoulder with spam pages, people who don't understand what the Concepts section is for and trolls, and they're getting ignored since people are surely seeing Concepts as nothing but a mess that's not worth their time.