Rising Storm/Red Orchestra 2 Multiplayer
 
New Battlefields await you!
Find and download new maps, mods, and more! Want to try your hand at modding or want to upload your mod to Steam for everyone to see? Click here to learn how.
ϟϟ Scionti Jul 29, 2013 @ 11:52pm
New Vehicles / Weapons (Depending on year, like in RO1)
I personally miss the variety, why hasnt anyone done this yet?
Showing 1-15 of 20 comments
< >
Moskeeto 1 Jul 30, 2013 @ 12:11am 
Because it's extremely difficult to make this sort of new content in the UE3 engine in comparison to UE2.5.
ϟϟ Scionti Aug 1, 2013 @ 4:23pm 
Well no ♥♥♥♥ sherlock, but I haven't even seen any attempts. Obviously vehicles are one thing, but weapons shouldn't be that hard.
[NL]jeffreybakker Aug 3, 2013 @ 5:21pm 
Why new weapons? In WW2 shooters you cant just put new stuff in it because most things which were actually used back then are already in the game.
ϟϟ Scionti Aug 3, 2013 @ 8:27pm 
Originally posted by NLJeffreybakker:
Why new weapons? In WW2 shooters you cant just put new stuff in it because most things which were actually used back then are already in the game.


Because more weapons existed with each passing year you tard ♥♥♥♥ that was in 1942 wasn't around in 1939, etc.
Last edited by ϟϟ Scionti; Aug 3, 2013 @ 8:28pm
[NL]jeffreybakker Aug 4, 2013 @ 2:58am 
Yes, thats true, but they werent always used in combat.
ϟϟ Scionti Aug 4, 2013 @ 3:02am 
So thye shouldn't be in game at all? Wat
[NL]jeffreybakker Aug 4, 2013 @ 3:03am 
If you're going for an realistic game, then I don't think they should be in the game.
ϟϟ Scionti Aug 4, 2013 @ 7:50am 
Originally posted by NLJeffreybakker:
If you're going for an realistic game, then I don't think they should be in the game.

Because using an MG42 for example would be unrealistic? Dude get the ♥♥♥♥ out of here, I think RO1 was in many ways just as; if not more realistic than 2, and had more weapon choices that corresponded with the year. You are seriously the only one to make such far-out claims that use of such weapons is unrealistic. It doesn't even have to be weapons that came out later in the war, many weapons that were produced before the war and even when this game takes place that were used historically. Hell, even the Soviet HMG I believe is from WW1...not the DP-28 although that was from 1928 as well, so the point is still the same. Also there are many German players who would love the P08 Luger to be in game as well. I mean for ♥♥♥♥s sake, the MKB is in there and THAT gun probably wasn't even realistically in Stalingrad, if it was there was probably enough that you could count them all on one hand, which I doubt.

There may not be much a difference, but hell, since when was variety a bad thing? It fleshes the game out more, and makes it feel more authentic. Stop being a queerbait. That's all.
Last edited by ϟϟ Scionti; Aug 4, 2013 @ 7:52am
[NL]jeffreybakker Aug 4, 2013 @ 8:05am 
Dude, just react in an mature way please.
I'm just saying, that if an weapon isn't used in an certain battle it shouldn't be in that map/game. If there is a game which takes place in '40/'41, there shouldn't be an MG42 cause it entered service in the Wehrmacht in '42. That isn't realistic, and if an game like RO2, which is based on realism, would have an MG42 in an '40/'41 scene, it wouldn't be realistic. Ask some average person what they think about what I just said, they wouldn't even care. But to me, or any other person which is very passionate about the WW2, it would ruine the game. It would be like robots riding on ostriches fighting the US Civil war against against Eskimos.
ϟϟ Scionti Aug 4, 2013 @ 8:16am 
I'm responding appropriately, the point you bring up about weapons being used in certain years is completely moot, as I stated that already. Its in my discussion title ffs, and is why I reference RO1, as that is exactly how it played out. The game needs to move past 40/41 for weapons beyond that and weapons before that should be added. How are you not getting this you prat?

Not to mention the MKB42 is in the ♥♥♥♥ing game, which is allows for some leeway imo.
Last edited by ϟϟ Scionti; Aug 4, 2013 @ 8:18am
[NL]jeffreybakker Aug 4, 2013 @ 8:32am 
No you're not responding appropriately, you're cursing and not very respectfull against me.
Why does the game need to go past '40/'41? Just so you can play with some other guns?
If so, ♥♥♥♥ you, you're not worth it play this game.
And I will stop with talking to you for now, You're part of an National Socialist group, have SS in front of your name and you're wearing an SS cap. You're just an ♥♥♥♥ing nazi...
Womb Raider Aug 6, 2013 @ 12:55am 
Originally posted by NLJeffreybakker:
No you're not responding appropriately, you're cursing and not very respectfull against me.
Why does the game need to go past '40/'41? Just so you can play with some other guns?
If so, ♥♥♥♥ you, you're not worth it play this game.
And I will stop with talking to you for now, You're part of an National Socialist group, have SS in front of your name and you're wearing an SS cap. You're just an ♥♥♥♥ing nazi...
To be honest he would never have been accepted into the SS, maybe in a foreign raised Waffen SS division doing their dirty work like cleaning up partisans..lol. Looks like an epic ♥♥♥♥♥♥ as well, love his VAC ban on record lol.
ϟϟ Scionti Aug 6, 2013 @ 8:07pm 
Lmao, nice strawman argument scrubs. Also look up 13th SS Division, either way, you guys are toolbags.
Freddy Aug 8, 2013 @ 1:52am 
Scionti is right in a few things and by the way the game set is, if i am not wrong 41 to 43

and the weapons like the PPD 40 and the PPS 43 and a few Russian Mosin Nagant version couldn t be wrong.

I hope there will come in the future a few weapons AND the MG 42 was used in Stalingrad not so much but IT WAS THERE

Forgot the PPS 42
Last edited by Freddy; Aug 8, 2013 @ 1:55am
Mr. Capone Aug 20, 2013 @ 11:01am 
Yeah! I would like to see an MG42 and a luger!
Showing 1-15 of 20 comments
< >
Per page: 15 30 50