Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
http://steamcommunity.com/workshop/filedetails/discussion/117478607/828925849458345141/
2. If you still think it's illegal then report it to Valve and move on. They're capable of looking into it.
The point of this thread isn't to discuss the legality of the game - I'll leave that to the other thread. The point of this thread is to emphasise that Valve are promoting illegal goods and doing nothing about it.
If I see even a single response from Valve saying 'we need to be contacted by the copyright owners' or 'we have no intention of promoting piracy' or even just 'we're looking into it' then I'll be happy, but I have seen _nothing_. Not a single thing.
From my point of view, this gives the impression that Valve simply doesn't care about the situation. They may well be frantically working behind the scenes to resolve the issue, but unless they actually say something about it, they just come across as being indifferent.
What I don't want to see is Greenlight becoming a haven for piracy.
Most people can't tell a legit game from one that infinges copyright and to be honest, you shouldn't _have_ to be able to tell - legit shops sell legit goods. Games like this just mean that the _good_ games that pass through Greenlight lose out because their potential customers have spent their money on another, illegal game.
More than anything, I don't want Steam to become a 3rd rate platform selling illegal goods. I simply wouldn't want to shop here any more if that's the case. I want Valve to understand that, and understand how allowing illegal games in Greenlight affects their image as a legitimate online retailer.
-Max
I mean, I've reported plenty of projects that were fake, trolls, spam or didn't belong to the people who posted them and they've been removed. Valve even send out automated emails to tell you how many of those projects they've removed.
Since people have been reporting this since the beginning of the year, it's probably safe to say Valve have heard about it. The fact it's still here suggests they've reviewed it. They're a lot more quick off the mark with regular Greenlight than they are with the Concepts section and even there they don't tend to leave things up there for a month or so.
Tamerlame: No offense, but that's complete nonsense. Plenty of shops, both online and offline, sell bootleg goods. They've been around for years, but that doesn't make them any more legitimate. I approve of you downvoting the game though =D
Do you see a slight flaw in your system?
Do you have any other bases for the premise of your thread?
Any form of social deviance however, has to have a noticable trend. I don't see the trend of a simular legal problem. If one gets away in 1000?, it is not a blemish on the larger image. It is a statistical probablity.
Ugh though. Anime and anime tie ins have all sorts of crazy legal problems. Would be interesting to have a legal discussion on that, but sadly not here...
At least, Pockie Pirates is not a bold as Pockie Ninjas. That game got away with advertizing on GameTrailers. No lawsuit, no C&D. If you are going to bark up the "Pokie Tree", regratably you might need the big guns to handle that group.
Though if I learned anything with deviance, people tend to disapprove of things that suggests infringement on popular laws, protections, and ideas. Honestly, the way to go is to simply make other people aware of the game. Let the social mob sort it out.
Apparently Eiichiro Oda has commented on it and said it does not have the rights to One Piece. (there is a discussion thread on the project that questions the legality. IT should have relevent links in it)
BTW: I consider the first point in OPs post "1) If it were officially licensed, it would be called One Piece and not 'Pockie Pirates'." To be a false assumption/premise.
(Also it's apparently named "little One Piece" or something in Chineese.)
Pokie Pirates was taken down once and then put back up. Maybe Valve did something about it but realized they couldn't keep them from resubmitting over and over and over using new accounts? Or something. =S
Zaxoth: I have no interest in hunting around for other illegal games in Greenlight. Skoardy has already mentioned that he's seen others and that they have been dealt with and removed. Of course I have no proof that they have absolutely no association with Shueisha other than the fact that they never mention the company anywhere on their site, don't have any copyright notices or in any way mention the creator of the series like any other legitimate site does.
If people _knowingly_ spend money on this sort of thing, they're more than welcome to do so. What annoys me is when people think it's legit and believe that the original creators get a cut of the money they're spending.
Unfortunately, western companies find it a lot easier to defend their IP in the west than eastern companies due to them being here and speaking the same language =D. It's even worse for the individual indie creators over there who can't speak English. They simply have no idea how to write a formal letter to a western shop to tell them that someone is ripping off their work. I just want to make sure that that never happens with Steam.
It's most likely going to be a lot quicker than anything else.