Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The system is working as intended.
The troll for them isn't the voting no, it is the announcing it. That way they get the reaction they want. These same trolls go and bad mouth games they don't even own, just for the reaction too.
In all honest, I have voted for over 500+ game. I only voted yes on 3 or 4 of them and am following only one. I just don't announce it for every game I vote no on.
We need a button to remove games from the queue if we don't want to browse through thousands of games to find new submissions. :D
Well then it seems as if the developers are getting the last laugh.
But anyways, if the comments break any Steam forums rules then just flag them and move on.
I've only went there to approve two games: Black Mesa and Leisure Suit Larry.
Someone once said 'Playing a game for the graphics is like watching porn for the story' missing the point entirely.
Also when I say 'They take great pleasure in saying that the game looks awful' I'm not just talking about the graphics. They'll go after a game even if the graphics are nice.
There doesn't seem to be a function to flag comments on Greenlight. Are you suggesting I flag their accounts?
Maybe then it should just be called the "Remove for queue button'.
Yes. If someone is breaking the rules in the comments then report such on their account.
Maybe that's a good idea. Not because of troll posts, trolls will be trolls no matter what.
But I think the "No" button prevents some users from using Greenlight. I read many times that users didn't press "No" because they don't want to disrespectful towards the developers and wouldn't mind if it were sold on Steam, the game just isn't their cup of tea.
These users end up with incredibly long queues that render Greenlight useless. Or in the best case make it very inconvenient to use.
On the other hand... maybe it's their own fault. Greenlight is self-explanatory as it is.
I don't follow. They seem to fit the profile of, saying nasty things hoping for a reaction.
Also I maybe I'm being too litereal here but I don't get the paralel with Flies. They don't seem to have a set season for trolling.
Not quite. I am new to Greenlight but only as a voter. I am surprised by the behavior of my fellow voters but more by the sheer scale of it. I believe I have seen one person take their submistion down from Greenlight due to trolling and I find idea that horrifing.
Even though I'm not a dev your concern and reason is good to see. Thanks anyway.
Like I said I I'm sorta new. I've voted yes for 22 submissions and of all of those most the trolling they got was at the start of their life. But maybe I just hit a bunch of exceptions
You know the devs (or guy/girl that submitted the project to greenlight) can delete offensive comments right?
What about the other side of the coin? What about the troll submissions? There is one guy that has submitted 3-4 projects (2 of them has been taken down by him), all concept stage projects with videos that show nothing and use other peoples copyrighted material and "screenshots" that show nothing and are most likely stolen as well.
If someone finds that person out and calls him/her on it should he/she as a troll have the means to punish people that notice this?
I don't know the context but somehow it seems you missed the point. This guy is saying that graphics doesn't matter, which seems highly relevant to the comments the people you consider trolls make. In his opinion their trolling is edgeless and he is trying to declaw the trolls by telling them so. (effectivly trying to do something similar to "removing the no button")
So the fact that the devs can delete posts means people can be as rude as they like?
Well as far as I've seen they never get round to deleting old posts so the fact they can hardly matters.
Can't say I've noticed that. And so what. Any troll submiters are wasting their money on something that can't (or shouldn't) actually upset anyone, not great trolling.
I don't see how removing or renaming the 'No' button would give a troll submiter power.