Democracy 3

Democracy 3

Not enough ratings
States of Anarchy v.0.22
 
Rate  
Favorite
Favorited
Unfavorite
File Size
Posted
Updated
40.269 MB
Sep 17, 2015 @ 10:19pm
Nov 4, 2015 @ 5:35pm
5 Change Notes ( view )

Subscribe to download
States of Anarchy v.0.22

Subscribed
Unsubscribe
Description
three new missions. Now with Anarchyballs and two new policies.
< >
62 Comments
Glovesflared Mar 5 @ 1:13pm 
Ancaps are the stupidiest people ever
HUNDmiau Jan 7 @ 3:05pm 
No problem. But I still think you should make both green. I am genuinely too stupid to mod games, otherwise I would do it myself. I would do it if I wasn't too lazy. (Maybe communism makes me lazy after all :D )
Cpt.Tripps.2012  [author] Jan 7 @ 1:34pm 
Thanks for the constructive comments @HUNDmiau
Cpt.Tripps.2012  [author] Jan 7 @ 1:33pm 
"Crimes should be increased by both "an"caps and ancoms. While ancoms are more likely to do crimes like burglary or breaking in, even violent crimes, "an"caps are still promoting crimes from the perspective of the state. They support hacking, tax-evading, not-following the day to day law etc. "an"coms should increase crimes more though, since we advocate more crimes, or at least crimes from the perspective of a state. (We think those "crimes" are justified) "

The AnCaps actually do increase black markets and taxevasion, but this information is hidden from the player durring gameplay
Cpt.Tripps.2012  [author] Jan 7 @ 1:31pm 
""an"caps should reduce currency strenght, since "an"caps don't think it is justified to enforce a currency and that the free market should also apply to currencies. " <- I really like that. Thanks!
HUNDmiau Jan 5 @ 4:01pm 
Crimes should be increased by both "an"caps and ancoms. While ancoms are more likely to do crimes like burglary or breaking in, even violent crimes, "an"caps are still promoting crimes from the perspective of the state. They support hacking, tax-evading, not-following the day to day law etc. "an"coms should increase crimes more though, since we advocate more crimes, or at least crimes from the perspective of a state. (We think those "crimes" are justified)
I could do a more thought-through list if you want to, but those are some ideas for a less biased, more realistic version. (When we'd go full realism, "an"caps would make everyone unhappy but the rich and wealthy, would insta police state you and create poverty aswell as unemployment)
HUNDmiau Jan 5 @ 4:01pm 
"an"caps should reduce currency strenght, since "an"caps don't think it is justified to enforce a currency and that the free market should also apply to currencies. (Like in Feudal Times, and no, this is one of the few times I am not comparing "Anarcho"-capitalism to Feudalism for Ideaological reasons: Feudal Times and early capitalist times had this thing going. Every bank was able to print their own "money")Both "An"caps and ancoms should displease and reduce the number of liberals. Neither of them likes them, and both at lest claim to be able to convert them easily. (Even though from observations, ancoms seem to be able to do it more efficently)
Poverty should not cause "an"caps. No poor person will say that a more free market will save him. (Or did any Revolution of the peasent create a more capitalist society?)
HUNDmiau Jan 5 @ 4:01pm 
It is good that both ancaps and ancoms give classwar. But classwar should increase ancom. Ancoms should boost productivity indirectly, no decrease it, through a different mode of production. This would need a different bubble called common ownership or Workers-Cooperatives, since those are the things ancoms advocate and we know for a fact that those did improve the productivity drasticly. Look at the economy of anarchist spain in the civil war. This economic boom was wonderful. Both ancaps and ancoms should reduce taxation, but ancaps more than ancoms since ancoms are more likely to pay taxes in this system than "an"caps are, because ancoms say that taxation is somewhat important as some money goes to social programms. Still lots of ancoms refuse to pay taxes to fund this unjust system.
HUNDmiau Jan 5 @ 4:00pm 
And now, some real ideas for this mod: (And yes, I am an ancom, and yes this is a somewhat biased answer. But I tried my best to be a little bit less biased than you)
First of all, make both "an"caps and ancoms green events. Then give both of them a fitting description how they see themselves, then make sure the one reduces the other at least a little. Or did you ever see "an"caps getting along with ancoms? Even though "an"caps should reduce ancoms less than ancom reduces "an"caps to show trend to anarcho-communism. More people turn to anarchism, while the people supporting "anarcho"-capitalism is more or less stable with only little change. The causes for ancom are good. "An"caps should be caused by the rich, since the rich people are more likely to advocate a system where their wealth can achieve more and can be used more freely. (Also rich people would benefit more from an "anarcho"-capitalist system)
HUNDmiau Jan 5 @ 3:15pm 
Yes, doesn't change the fact that they are correct and "anarchy"balls is not. Misinformation is really never a good thing