3
Products
reviewed
0
Products
in account

Recent reviews by The Eye

Showing 1-3 of 3 entries
4 people found this review helpful
4.4 hrs on record
This game is so stupid that you just have to love it. it's like a really bad car crash, you know you shouldn't stare, but there is just something about it that makes us HAVE to look. It is a rather short game (2.3 hours for me according to steam) but with the good visuals it dosn't seem that long. I will give this a 6/10
Posted June 20, 2017.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
92 people found this review helpful
6 people found this review funny
956.6 hrs on record (495.4 hrs at review time)
EA Escape review...
I have been playing this game on and of since I got it over a year ago, and the following is my thoughts on the game and it's development since then. Pls.forgive spelling :)

When I first got the game I saw great potential in this game, I mean.. SPACE, Building, Tower defence, and combat... how could I go wrong. Well I will till you this, my first opinion was a negative review, the game was a resource hog, there wasn't much to do, was able to beat the game to my satisfaction in just one sitting on the weekend (-8 hours). But hey, it was EA and as such I do not give bad reviews to EA games that are still being worked on, because you never know right? However if I had, I would have given the game a 3/10.

Over the year I have been part of the "Bleeding Edge" bate patch group. AKA the, "this game is now broken" patch where new stuff was tested. there were several hickups when patches were relised, however all you had to do was report the issue and 9/10 the problem was fixed with a new patch in just a few hours. NICE JOB DEV'S. main patches we constent 1-3 days apart, except when RL issues delayed the Dev. However being a one person team sometimes this happens. It was not uncommon to even have several main patches a day if the DEV was on a roll. So is the Dev dedicated to this game??? I would have to say he is more dedicated then 99.9% of the Devs out there. Just for that point alone the game then became a 6/10.

What's my opinion now that the game is out of EA??? Well I have to be honest, the game isn't done to my hopes and dreams that the potential first showed. but I need not worry because the Dev still plans on putting in just as many hours a week now as he has in the past so MUCH more stuff to come. the game is still a bit of a resource hog on top settings, just when you take in consideration when I fist started the game I was on the lowest settings and getting lag, I can now play abouve recomended with little no no lag... 1000% improvment Many items, and tings to do have been added taking an 8 hour game well past 150 hours (depending on your play style) the dificulty with the added features have made a game that I use to play on hard settings into a game I need to play on below normal (still learning the new stuff).

I have been typing to long now so I will give you my "out of EA" rating. I would love to give this game a 9/10 but due to some bugs and glitches still active I can only give it an 8/10. losing one point for the glitches (all games have them even "finished" games) and losing one just because you can always improve the game right? BTW 8/10 is the highest rating I have ever given a game... so that alone is a "WAY TO GO DEV"
Posted November 9, 2015.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
2 people found this review helpful
1,021.8 hrs on record (767.3 hrs at review time)
Early Access Review
This type of game is not for everyone, but if you like a game where you can do what you want, when you want, but have the game still kick you backside from time to time, this is the game for you. 700 + hours playing should tell you if I like it.. or just a sucker for punisment.. well worth the mone on sale or not
Posted July 15, 2014.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
Showing 1-3 of 3 entries