Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Where is Steam multiplayer integration?
Where is Naval fixes?
Where the updates they talk so much?
Yeah they have more pirate players playing in game ranger then the Original game.
I deserve this, now i have learned not to buy games when it is in early access.
Battlegoat devs are nice people, but their title feels like a quick money grab.
So, the developer completely ignores the main issue at hand here (lack of a supply system) and goes on to say that we should not complain about a lack of features even during early access? You either say it is a planned feature or not, just saying "well, maybe, I don't really know" is teasing and can lead consumers intentionally in the wrong.
You know whether or not a major factor is ever even going to be looked at, as such implementation would drastically change the scope of the game to the point that it can't just be casually implemented at a later date/
"Originally posted by BattleGoat Studios:
While Supreme Ruler 1936 simulates the wide span of WWII, like other games of the genre we have strengths and weaknesses to what we can simulate in high detail. Naval is currently not a "specialty" of SR1936, though we do have every intention of continuing to improve this area.
-- George / BattleGoat."
As posted on pg 2 of the discussion.
Link:
http://steamcommunity.com/app/244410/discussions/0/630802344410551969/