Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'm curious to hear the thoughts of other players who have played both games. I pretty much only play the original Warlock multiplayer. I haven't played the new game in multiplayer yet since noone else in my gaming circle has it, but I feel the changes are better suited to single player. Similarly why I never play Armageddon in multiplayer. If the environment is more hostile than your opponent it tend to distract from direct competition. "Did I lose because I'm a worse player or because I got ganked by an uber spawn on turn 10?" Multiplayer has always seemed to be an afterthought for Warlock (and the majority of turn based strategy games these days) which is such a shame.