Select your preferred language.

Last Online: 1 hrs, 45 mins ago


Actions
Gameplay Stats
Member since:
October 9, 2004
Steam Rating:
10
Playing time:
48.7 hrs past 2 weeks
Dragon Age: Origins
38.4 hrs / 47.9 hrs
Left 4 Dead 2
10.3 hrs / 10.3 hrs
View stats
Friends

- Яe|jocƘ -
In-Game
Left 4 Dead 2 - Join

[c³] XERO
In-Game
Left 4 Dead 2

^3num^0bers
In-Game
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2...

Fzero 'looking
In-Game
Team Fortress 2

The Bloody Beetroot
In-Game
Left 4 Dead 2

XBetaAlpha
In-Game
Left 4 Dead 2 - Join

View all 180 friends

Steam Profile

Downtown1

Profile _

United States 

No information given.


Comments _
You must be logged on to add comments.

There are no comments on this account.

Groups _
No Parking
3 Members  |  0 In-Game  |  1 Online  |  0 In Group Chat

In essence, the question NP = P? asks: if 'yes'-answers to a 'yes'-or-'no'-question can be verified "quickly" (in polynomial time), can the answers themselves also be computed quickly?

Consider, for instance, the subset-sum problem, an example of a problem which is "easy" to verify, but whose answer is believed (but not proven) to be "difficult" to compute. Given a set of integers, does some nonempty subset of them sum to 0? For instance, does a subset of the set {−2, −3, 15, 14, 7, −10} add up to 0? The answer "yes, because {−2, −3, −10, 15} add up to zero", can be quickly verified with a few additions. However, finding such a subset in the first place could take much longer. The information needed to verify a positive answer is also called a certificate. Given the right certificates, "yes" answers to our problem can be verified in polynomial time, so this problem is in NP.

Visit No Parking's profile

QuarterToThree - Public
627 Members  |  27 In-Game  |  169 Online  |  0 In Group Chat

Widescreen Gaming Forum - Public
200 Members  |  10 In-Game  |  49 Online  |  0 In Group Chat