My reviews operate under a fairly strict logic:

-First is the "10" scale which refers to superficial qualities and the execution of those things graphics/audio/non-essential gameplay systems if the game excels in multiple of these fields i will award it with a "10" if it does not it gets a "0" and in rare cases a "1" which is reserved for games which i just want to insult

-Second is the "Good/Bad Game" system these refer to gameplay direction and the ability of the developers in creating a pleasurable gamefeel or just a clear demonstration of game design mastery games that impress me in this regard are awarded "Good Game" games that i find lacking or are clearly not really meant to be well designed games will be given "Bad Game"

-Third and also last is the "Recommendation" this field is my opinion on if the game is worth your time to get into some games may have fantastic gameplay but simply require too much of an investment to really appreciate these games despite possibly even having a "10/10 Good Game" rating may not be approachable at their price point and so i cannot in good faith recommend them to people who are not already interested in that very specific experience other games may simply fail to deliver a complete package of gameplay despite being exceedingly good in their niche or simply don't live up to their pricing period