This is a Public Group
Steam Group
! Smoking Rocks. Anti smokers need to die! (wuahaha) (SR)
Sick of anti smokers and their maligned attitudes.
Since September 30, 2007
110 Members
Derby, United Kingdom (Great Britain) 
"Oh they enjoy smoking, I don't like it, therefore I must make an ass of myself and try to spoil their enjoyment"
There's always somebody that will enjoy something you don't, doesn't make you superior, just makes you different.
Anti-smokers need another bandwagon to jump on. Bunch of uninformed arrogant twunts.
And I quote:
"[...] An awkward fact is that the results of the many studies on the effects of ETS exhibit little consistency in RRs, with a dispersion (in those on spousal smoking, for example) ranging from 0.51 (based on eleven cancer cases) to 4.82 (based on eight). On the most strict reckoning a large majority of results show that the relative risk could be negative (ie below 1.0) which implies a reduced risk of lung cancer from higher exposure – that is, a protective effect from ETS – just as inoculation protects against subsequent infection.
Of course, since each research study examines only a small sample of the total universe (some fewer than a dozen cases of lung cancer), allowance must be made for a margin of error, which is conventionally pitched at 5%. The resulting 95% probability is shown with a varying ‘confidence interval’ which conveys the range within which the true relative risk is likely to fall. For example, the result of the Butler study in 1988, based on a tiny sample of eight lung cancer cases and a probability of only 90% (in place of 95%), yielded a ‘best estimate’ for the RR of 2.02 (that is, twice the risk of lung cancer from ETS exposure) but the range of the confidence interval is shown as 0.48 - 8.56 at 90%.
In layman’s language this means we can be 90% certain (not even 95% in this study) that the true relative risk fell somewhere between 0.48 – which implies a strong protective effect from exposure to ETS – and 8.56, which implies a much enhanced risk of cancer.[...]"
An excerpt from "Smoking Out The Truth"
Forest President, Lord Harris of High Cross,
8 March 2005
Read it yourself, and get something else to feel superior about.
http://www.forestonline.org/files/pdf/Smoking%20Out%20The%20Truth.pdf
Forest Online
11 out of 110 members are currently online
2 Members In-Game / 0 Players in Chat
Administrators:
Members:
View current status of all members
Instead I find folk have joined..
What can one say except "Welcome, and thank... More
! Smoking Rocks. Anti smokers need to die! (wuahaha) has 0 upcoming events in the next 2 weeks - View all events



