Giriş
|
Dil
Български (Bulgarca)
čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Nederlands (Flemenkçe)
English (İngilizce)
Suomi (Fince)
Français (Fransızca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Magyar (Macarca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce)
Português-Brasil (Brezilya Portekizcesi)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
Español (İspanyolca)
Svenska (İsveççe)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
ไทย (Tayca)
Steam'i Çevirmemize Yardım Edin




1) The arguement that Valve has not kept its promises to their loyal customers regarding the release of new content for L4D is correct; we are fully justified in our righteous anger.
2) The arguement that the source code that makes up L4D2 has not had changes made to it that could not be handed out as an update to the current L4D source code is wholly INCORRECT. Although I do not work at Valve, I am in college for video game design/programming (graduate in March, take note Valve!) and have an understanding how the Havok Engine that L4D uses works. The kind of base gameplay changes that L4D2 claims to offer WOULD, in fact, require (for proper operation) a whole new game to be coded and produced. After all, what gamer wants DLC that crashes your game's source engine in mid-game? No one, that's who. Over all? I am with you.
Gov's can go eff themselves. They think we don't know better/
Rather than in L4D, when it was Lethal.
Could be wrong.. I hardly pay attention to L4D2 anyway.
The more forbidden something is, the more people will want their hands on it.
It's not like the Austrailian government just refused the game 'because we don't like it', but due to the violence. If L4D already passed (their standards) and thats fairly violent, then what exactly is L4D2 doing? Making zombies bleed out (??? - They're already dead, blood clotting) on every shot?
Playing L4D I don't find it's the blood or the violence that is the key thing that is massively missing from the game, Valve...