login
|
language
Български (Bulgarian)
čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Suomi (Finnish)
Français (French)
Deutsch (German)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Italiano (Italian)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese)
Português-Brasil (Portuguese-Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
Español (Spanish)
Svenska (Swedish)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
ไทย (Thai)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Help us translate Steam






Isn't it nice?
Haven't had this many problems with a game since the broken PS3 console ports!
"IT JUST WORKS"
Todd 'Liar' Howard
My rig
Core i5
8 GB ram
Geoforce GTX 950
My critique so far for FO4: FO3 and New Vegas, despite the old graphics, still is more enjoyable to play than FO4. Heck even the old FO1 , FO2, and FO Tactics had more story to them. Boone from NV is way more helpful than Garvey and Veronica kicks more a** than any melee proficient companion in FO4. Heck even Miria from FO2 (for the people who know who I'm talking about) was way more useful than Piper. Overall, there were lots of moments where more could have been done instead of "that will do." It was over hyped and got many fan's hopes up only to fall short on the low end of the stick.
"... there are obvious differences, such as the inclusion of Havok Physics and Papyrus scripting."
SANS IS DAT A HOOMAN
And to clarify, it's not the exact same engine as FO3. Fallout 3 uses the Gamebryo engine, whilst Skyrim and Fallout 4 use Bethesda's Creation Engine. Whilst the Creation Engine is based on Gamebryo, there are obvious differences, such as the inclusion of Havok Physics and Papyrus scripting.