login
|
language
Български (Bulgarian)
čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Suomi (Finnish)
Français (French)
Deutsch (German)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Italiano (Italian)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese)
Português-Brasil (Portuguese-Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
Español (Spanish)
Svenska (Swedish)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
ไทย (Thai)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Help us translate Steam






GEE THANKS
Are you really complaining about historical accuracy in a game that stops being historically accurate the second the game unpauses? It's a historical sandbox. If I wanted to see borders never change, I'd read a world map.
Your game gets sluggish and you start a new game.
15 year truces are meant to do that and one other thing
Make annul treaties worthwhile.
With 15 year truces, the annul treaties are actually useful!
Now you can attack the OPM that Austria allied for some reason without their intervention.
The truce adds neither difficulty nor limited options. It instead offers new tactics to using annul treaties and also allows you to think more broadly instead of focusing on annexing a single nation only.