安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Monaco The World Is Mine
it seems too many are doing it as a bogus artistic statement. sure monaco is fun & thomas was alone was even beautiful in its way. but those are grand exceptions imo.
monaco is a good game , a diamond in a sea of turd though.
game play is every thing and i own a lot of indy titles, but some of these games are similar to the games i played in the 80's on my spectrum 48k and they still ask 7 quid or more.
i beta tested on WOWP and WOT and they appreciated the testers efforts and they didnt charge me for the expirience.
im not slagging poeples efforts just the value for money in some cases.
The standard has not dropped - you are just seeing the bad and not looking at the good.
There's tons of good games and there isn't any real drop in quality.
However, none of this really matters to you. You simply can ignore them. What you seem to be basing your complaint on is that you seem to think there's a finite number of "shelf space" available and such "bad" games (in your opinion) are taking up space that other game might occupy - it doesn't work like that.
If you're not assuming this, then I honestly don't see why you're complaining as it doesn't affect you in any way.
i didnt feel cheated , they were hours if not days of fun.
look at some of the prices on some indi games and tell me that you like paying for an unreveiwed, unfinished game that might have you bord stupid with it by the time that it finally gets released.
that way it has to aleast have playability that will grab you for a few hours.
That's an entirely different kettle of fish. You could equally say the same for many AAA releases. There aren't unreviewed at all, so I don't know where you're getting tghat idea from. Neither are the vast majority anything like unfinished - this just sounds like scaremongering.
Getting back to the point you were trying to make is that "retro/indie" games are popping up - yes they are, and do you know why? Because the DEMAND for them is there.
But you claimed rather sweepingly that the standards are slipping, and I'm afraid I see no evidence of that whatsoever. You can point to Greenlight, but the whole point is that Greenlight games are being OFFERED for acceptance - not all get through, and from what I've seen it is rare that something awful gets through.
I think you're just being sweeping and unfair.
I like your idea about Greenlight games having a free weekend or period - that would be a great idea as it's night on impossible to vote for a game and know how it's going to turn out. However a demo for such games is going to be tough - constructing a demo takes a lot of time and resources (more than you might think), and as most indie devs have rather small resources, this would undoubtedly impact on them heavily.
Personally, I'm glad that digital distribution has caught on so that indie devs can get their games out now - I've bought enough on PC, PS3, 360, DS, PSP and Wii to show there are PLENTY of good quality.
good games are out there but it's having to dig through the dross to get to them.
every time you want to find any none bias info on a game i have to google it and read what ever you can find , negativety seem to be jumped on, on these forums.
if you buy a full price game you get a metascore with player reveiws, why dont steam do similar with indi games and allow honest player reviews.
having divided loyalties by steam between players and small developers makes it hard for steam to critirise the games they sell.
Steam isn't a place for anyone to criticise video games.