安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Either way the Intel build is more powerful than the AMD build, at least in games. The 4670k wipes the floor with the 8350 in games, the FX only wins in something like video rendering perhaps, but if for gaming, better go with Intel in that price range.
Personally I'd go with a Seasonic PSU, but that's just preference. Well, I mean, they're known for their quality...
also, instead of the Phantom 410 case you could go with a Bitfenix Raider/Ronin/Shinobi, Corsair 200R, NZXT Source 210 Elite or NZXT H2 to save some. Those cases offer basically the same features as the Phantom 410.
ED: As for the PSU, do you really need 750W? Like, do you plan to SLI/CFX in the foreseeable future? Otherwise it'd be better to go for 500-600W 80+B.
and 4690k /w z97 board will cost about the same
the amd build is cheaper, but will not keep up with the intel build
http://uk.pcpartpicker.com/p/TMPwyc
newer cpu, better cheaper gpu, mobo/psu capable for crossfire
can add a 240g ssd if you can go a little over £800
http://uk.pcpartpicker.com/p/FKFRYJ
@OP, definitely go with what he linked. CPU, GPU are noticeably more powerful than your AMD build, has more hard drive space and a better cooler.
the bitfenix case is white, but has more room inside for gpu
the black odd will stick out like a sore thumb
aira has the black ver for slightly cheaper
http://www.aria.co.uk/Products/Components/Cases/Midi+Tower/BitFenix+Comrade+Midi-Tower+-+Black+?productId=59627
ps. the builds people have sent me, ASUS fanboy over here. only want asus graphics cards. i used MSI as i dont like crossing Intel with AMD radeon GPU dont ask me why haha.
Could anyone help me how i could Improve my AMD without changing it all together.
games still rely heavily on 1 thread, which is why core speed makes a bigger difference over core count
More threads ^ on the cheap if you sway to intel.
http://www.techspot.com/review/645-tomb-raider-performance/page5.html
Contraditcting _I_ 1 thread theory ^.
I would have to say getting more threads / cores be it amd or intel is a better bet for the long haul.
http://www.techspot.com/review/615-far-cry-3-performance/page6.html
And another i3 trails behind blowing the theory.
Also core speed counts and the architecture.
the AMD FX may have 4-6-8 cores, but it's always 2 cores in one module, thus two cores sharing cache etc, which results in lower performance than one actual own core would have.
That's why a 4-core Intel beats an 8-core AMD in games. Because the Intel cores are way more powerful than the AMD cores.
his benchmarks shatter it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4et7kDGSRfc
Keep in mind, with AMDs you often pay some more for a good Mobo because you basically need the best chipset and a very good board so it doesnt run the FX at slower specs or throttled speeds.
Intel CPUs however are better in that respect and basically run the same in a 50 buck Mobo as in a 200 buck mobo.
ED: Look up gaming benchmarks. The general result is that Intel i5 are on par or better than FX8000 series.
That video, well, seems odd to me. I'm not doubting the legitimacy, but in all the other gaming benchmarks i've seen on various reknown sites, the better i5 beat the 8350 in most games. Yeah there's a selection of games where the 8350 wins, but that's a small selection compared.
the i3 ahead of the 6200 and not far behind the 8300 is trailing?
on bf4, the i3 3220 sits between the fx 6350,8350, and 4320,8120 right near the gpu bottleneck of a 290x
http://www.techspot.com/review/734-battlefield-4-benchmarks/page6.html
the game can use 8 threads, but 1 thread is
tomb raider is a poor console port, which is why it needs more cpu power on more threads