Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Specific explanation you can find on my main group.
I wouldnt miss an optical drive. Alot of games espacially in the stores which sometimes are even cheaper then origin or steam itself come on DVD. Just recently installed The Division, Battlefront 2015 and Titanfall 2 from it to save 60GB downloading. Also I like to watch movies from it and to just install all the old games incl. the ones that come for free from magazines. In the end you can buy a used one for 5$ or a new one for <15$.
recording videos could profit a lot from having an i7. If you not intend to overclock an i5 I would save on the MoBo by taking a B250 and a non-K CPU like i5-7500.
https://skinflint.co.uk/?cat=WL-833394
But if you want part picker so bad...
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/9Tw2sJ
which is not true it contains as many shops as your link too...
Also both your builds are terrible. i5-7400? why for 5$ more you get the 15% stronger i5-7500...bad SSD no HDD as anyone could be good with only 240GB space they days. Why the hell a 3GB 1060 when he has the budget to even buy a GTX 1070? 70$ for a semi-modular 450W PSU? Are you serios? Also only 1x8GB slow RAM which is more expensive then the way faster DDR4-3000? Also ignoring dual channel...
This is $1500, but it can do high resolution
I had to use the 200R ATX case because it was the only case that had any compatible optical drives on the site. Also, I'm probably just going to buy the windows 10 license normally, though I may change my mind about this later.
Build[pcpartpicker.com]
Is this good? Also, is an i7 necessary for recording videos, or can I substitute it for an i5 to save money?
Build [pcpartpicker.com]
Any last changes I can make to reduce costs without impacting the performance that much? This computer is slightly more expensive than I was expecting, so any way to reduce the cost without impacting performance too much would be appreciated.
Likely final build [pcpartpicker.com]
I'm also most likely just going to buy windows 10, as I don't really know my windows 8.1 product key (my current pc is this terrible store bought one) and all the ways I looked up either require messing with the bios, or looking for a sticker on the case that I can't find, though it could be on the bottom of it or inside it, places I haven't checked yet. Even then, I don't really know where to get windows 10 unactivated, which kind of complicates things. I just figured it would be easier to buy it.
Also, I had another question that no-one answered yet. Basically, I don't really want to build it myself if I can help it for fear of breaking something, but I do know there are websites that can build you computer for you and ship it to you. I have a few of them written down, but I want some recommendations of these kinds of sites. I may just build it myself if it's absolutely necessary, but I would rather use one of those sites.
Anyway, I'm likely going to buy this computer around the weekend, give myself more time to decide on which hdd to get. I'll most likely post when I order it and/or when it's set up and say how well it runs.
For a mere 10-15% performance in selected games(single threaded focus), the 7700K doesn't offer a good value proposition when compared to Ryzen 7 1700(which can again be OC'ed easily on a cheaper B350 chipset). Especially since you are thinking of video recording etc.
Below is a video of a professional TechTuber who switched to Ryzen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjzzdkUvKhk
In the video below you can simply upscale the amount of background applications and the results would be more or less same given the fact that in most games the 7700K is pegged at 90-99% CPU utilization, so you have literally no headroom left for anything else.
(The video however is a comparison between the lower end i3s and Ryzen 3, but since upscaling is a thing you can get similar results in a case of Ryzen 7 vs 7700k)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whXFKsSbvro
Considering the fact that you get literally double the cores and threads and you want to record videos, and possibly even stream them, then grabbing the Ryzen 7 is a easy choice over anything else currently.
You can also save that 32$ from the cooler since Ryzen 7 comes with a really competent stock cooler. You can also save another 20$ from the motherboard if you decide for a B350 Chipset from AMD(which is also very competent and OC'able). And you can still save about 20-30$ more on the Ryzen 7 1700 itself. That leaves you with about ~70-80$ to work with. Add a few bucks more and you can probably grab a cheap GTX1070(assuming prices have normalized).
Or you can even use those 70-80$ to get a SSD(which you do not have in your build currently), your system will feel more snappier and faster to work with. Having your OS on an SSD is pretty much worth it now-a-days. Loading times are faster, apps launch quicker and in-game loading screens are significantly reduced.
Currently, Ryzen offer way to many advantages over the i7 7700k, which only beats it in gaming performance but the margins aren't high enough to justify purchasing it.
With GTX 1070 but no SSD -- https://pcpartpicker.com/list/x8z4LD ~ $1253
With GTX 1060 & SSD -- https://pcpartpicker.com/list/JNWkQV ~ $1202
(In both the builds I've just chosen the top end B350 mobo but you can replace that with MSI Tomahawk or an AsRock B350 board and shave another 10-25$ off it)
(Also I've chosen a 250GB SSD, but that is not necessary if you're only going to run your OS on it then 150Gb is more than enough)
Probably going to stay with what I came up with earlier, as the i7 has more powerful cores despite only having half the cores of the Ryzen, unless of course anyone knows if the Ryzen can run heavily modded minecraft well (ex. a mod pack with 100 - 150+ mods at 30+ fps with decent settings).
Also, your builds are kind of expensive. Maybe if I do get the Ryzen, I would just replace the i7 in the list to make the build cheaper, unless that would cause issues. I might get an ssd as well if I can get the price low enough, but I doubt the price can get much lower without impacting performance.
I suggested Ryzen 7 in a more general use-case scenario but if Minecraft is the only thing you'll be playing and if per your research the i7 works better on that then no harm grabbing it.
Yes the builds I posted were merely placeholders as I suggested you can swap out the expensive B350 mobo for something less cheaper(but about as good). Or just do away with the GTX1070.
SSD even if you make the Intel build I'd say will come in handy with OS booting etc. definitely aim for at least a 150GB model(the one in my build is 250GB so that's costlier).
I'm probably getting the i7 as it runs heavily modded minecraft better, and apparently some people have been getting relatively poor performance with the Ryzen in minecraft for reasons I haven't found out yet. I don't mind if it does worse for rendering videos and playing other games, I've been wanting to play modded minecraft and skyrim, among other games, for a while and as long as they run with decent performance while recording, then I'm fine with it. Though, as I stated before, I'm still not sure if I would want to record videos yet. At least the option is there if I decide I would want to.
Also, I realized that the ram used in the build can get sold out. Just in case it does, though it's unlikely to at this point, is there any good alternatives that you could recommend as a backup?