Instalar o Steam
Iniciar sessão
|
Idioma
简体中文 (Chinês Simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês Tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol de Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol da América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Brasil)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar problema de tradução
No he/she can't. You cannot trade games in your Library (and since it's already been played, it's obviously not in Inventory).
This sounds reasonable to you?
Not to mention Steam gets 30% of a sale, and the 75% back would cost them and extra 45% of what was paid. Afterall, the developers won't be giving a single penny back. Steam would lose twice what it made from the sale.
Is this your first time shopping? :S
Honestly, I would like to see some sort of trade-in system implemented -- nothing big, just a simple little program that lets you get something back for a game. The only stipulation I would have is that the game can't have been played for any amount of time. If you buy a game and never play it, you should be able to trade it back in if you don't want it. I dunno, maybe that's just ME feeling entitled.
That being said, it would send a more accurate message about how popular/well received a game is, which you would think developers would appreciate. The question is, would they be willing to foot the cost and slap that kind of guarantee on their product? If left to Valve alone, they won't do anything like this, but if certain developers agree to some kind of guarantee like this, who knows?
EDIT: To make things clear, whatever credit you got back for a game you didn't play would have to be spent on a game from the same developer, meaning they wouldn't lose any money in the end.
If someone buys a game and doesn't play it, what does that say about the game? It says that they were willing to spend money on the game, but they weren't actually very lively when it came to actually playing the game. It reflects interest or lack of interest in the game -- if you see a certain title getting traded in a lot, maybe future iterations of that title should be tweaked to make them more entertaining and get gamers more interested in it.
You really don't think about things from a marketing perspective, do you?
Companies will never do this because they would lose sales and sales = money. You really don't think about things from a business perspective, do you?