Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
by the way... you should use the
In short yes.
However because there is no Booker there is no Comstock. Thus a new universe is created from the old ones, a universe where Comstock, since he no longer exists, never crosses over and never takes Anna in 1893. A universe where Booker and Anna are never seperated. A universe where Anna exists but not Elizabeth.
It is a Merry Paradox, but think of it this way, If you end the Booker/Comstock interaction, and end Elizabeth/Anna, you also end that which resolves the Dilemma, and causes the story to come to that end, thus completely recreating the conditions for the Booker/Comstock Elizabeth/Anna storyline to open up again. Destroying the timeline destroys that which destroys the timeline, thus ensuring that it is always in flux, existing, and not existing, all at once...
physics babble babble quantum blah blah blah there is no God?
Horray for religion?
Something like that.
I view it as the "Tails" outcome, with the "Heads" outcome being Anna gettin sold. Booker's Baptism creates the Tails outcome of no Comstock/Leutuce crossing over.
No, Booker is not removed from all worlds. There are two main Bookers - the one that you play who refused the baptism initially and never came back and the Booker who initially refused baptism but came back later to get baptized. The second Booker, the one who came back, is the one who becomes Comstock and THAT is the one who gets drowned. The drowning scene takes place when Booker came back to get baptized so all the Bookers who didn't come back go on living, but all the Bookers who were about to become Comstock are killed.
After rewatching the ending at least five times, I think Elizabeth disappeared with Zachary Comstock. After the multi-verse Elizabeths' drown Booker, they all disappear with the sound of a piano note. After the screen fades to black (with the original Elizabeth being the only one remaining in the river) there's a final piano note which leads me to believe that she, too, cannot exist anymore. The whole purpose of killing Booker was so that there would only be a Booker Dewitt and an Anna Dewitt with no Comstock, no Columbia, etc. if that makes sense?
Well he wouldn't have to rescue Anna/Elizabeth from anything because there would be no Comstock which means Anna never would have been taken from him.
To make the changes that they are talking about in the game it would mean that there was no muliveres until the Leutuce's discovered them. It would have to be finite muliveres'. This is so that the compartmentalized changes that are made to the muliverse would actually matter. At the end of the game there would be only the one "fixed" timeline with no other universes in this case. Kinda like "Back to the Future 2".
It would still happen in some world some way some how. With the possibility of infinite out comes, you cannot edit out a fraction of infinity. It's not mathematically possible. You cant stop what happened. Unless you argue Lis is magic.