Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

View Stats:
Sim' Feb 13, 2014 @ 4:59am
Premium version of Cs:go
Isn't it possible to make an premium version of the matchmaking system? Like 5-10€ per month which gives you a more stable server with 128tick, better version of anti-cheating like EAC. This would benefit both the players and valve itself. People would enjoy the game more and valve would be making more money, win/win situation.
Showing 1-15 of 127 comments
< >
Raoul[GER] Feb 13, 2014 @ 5:00am 
not enough people would pay 5-10€ per month and they would make loss with 128 tick servers then
dXull Feb 13, 2014 @ 5:05am 
are you stupid?!!!
MasacruAlex Feb 13, 2014 @ 5:05am 
Originally posted by Red_Bull:
are you stupid?!!!

Sim' Feb 13, 2014 @ 5:05am 
No need to go all in at first. Make the feature available and see the interest. And I'm quite positive it will be a success. For example the more serious players or the professionals will forsure pay for it. People who are sick of mIRC mixes and so on. So I doubt they would lose money on a small trial period.
Jaska Feb 13, 2014 @ 5:06am 
Originally posted by RaoulGER:
not enough people would pay 5-10€ per month and they would make loss with 128 tick servers then
People pay for operations and for ESEA, so why not?
.nash Feb 13, 2014 @ 5:07am 
esea is better.
Sim' Feb 13, 2014 @ 5:08am 
#2 why am I stupid for making a suggestion to improve the game servers? Shouldn't be mandatory, so you could stay on the 64tick of course.
MiraCZ Feb 13, 2014 @ 5:10am 
Why dont you join ESEA, then?
.nash Feb 13, 2014 @ 5:10am 
dXull Feb 13, 2014 @ 5:10am 
I dont wanna pay more for this game
All is good only this new pistol and the sound bug are not good but the other things are okey i dont have fps bugs and i play with ultra high settings with a normal laptop and i can start the game and i can play it i dont know why this peopls have so many problems and why they are hating the scope valve maked the scope only more realistic!!!
Sim' Feb 13, 2014 @ 5:12am 
Well I could (thought it only existed for Na? Correct me if im wrong). But why use a third part when valve could easily implant it themselves.
Hermann-senpai~ Feb 13, 2014 @ 5:17am 
0/10 troll thread reported
Sim' Feb 13, 2014 @ 5:21am 
Red Bull, I'm not hating on the update. I'm making a suggestion to make a p2p feature for servers with better update rate and better anti-cheating. Since it requires the double bandwidth it's necessary for valve to take out some extra money for the feature.
Angela Merkelele Feb 13, 2014 @ 5:22am 
I've already paid 10€ for this game, no thanks.
|Gent| Mc Mentlegen #Graduated Feb 13, 2014 @ 5:27am 
Originally posted by Pat:
I've already paid 10€ for this game, no thanks.

You do realite this is an optional feature being suggested, right? Of course it would be better if such a service was free, but that's not gonna happen, so I'd rather have the option to pay for 128 tick servers then either be stuck with the 64 tick servers or pay ESEA, which is a service I do not want to support after the recent scandal.
Showing 1-15 of 127 comments
< >
Per page: 15 30 50

Date Posted: Feb 13, 2014 @ 4:59am
Posts: 127