Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
When I buy a game, I damn well expect it to have all the features.
In case of Dino D-Day the price is very good, so I can't complain.
But every single time I get screwed over buy "purchasable content" I loose interest and
hope in the gaming industry. I'm kind of an old school gamer and I have seen this
coming a long way off.
Take Borderlands, for example. I just love that game. I am also a sucker for
customization. Are they serious about every other head costing money?
I don't mind much about bigger DLC, if there's real content for your money, but please.
So I will wait for the BL2 GOTY to be cheap before even considering buying.
Even though they still hold out on the heads and stuff.
As for Dino D-Day, pull that crap off, and I will delete it and won't look back.
It's a fun game as it is, but don't murder it by putting in money wasters.
But it's not a question of being paid. If that were valid, all dev teams from before
the whole DLC buisness would have gone broke.
True, many did (and still do) but don't tell me they would starve without DLC.
I remember EA games (just to name one example) from when they actually programmed
original games that were fun to play. Today, it's a monstrous company, leaving
visible holes in their games for the purpose of stuffing them later with DLC.
And everyone thinks that's totally normal and ok to do?
Again, not complaining about DDD in general, small team, basically started as a mod.
But yeah, when I pay retail price for a game, I damn well expect it to be finished.
At least I don't want to stumble over obvious shortcomings left there on purpose.
So, when D-Day would have this mechanic (certain weapons only for money, or
this or that dino species) I really wouldn't bother.That's of course just my opinion,
and I don't claim it to be the Holy Grail of gaming. I simply got sick and tired of
those types of games and won't play them anymore. So those games lost
at least one customer, and I'm sure I am not the only one who feels like that.
Not that those ridiculous prices for their DLC won't compensate for that, heh.
The bugged release and bad reviews wont help, the graphics on this day and age with all those 'gamers' that want every inch of 'next-gen' polygons won't help... i can't see other way beyond going F2P- and that means another way of monetization coming in.
The only problem is balancing f2p with those bad behaviours of pay 2 win; Avoiding that all is good- and of course, rewarding those who bought the game beforehand.
I will even say that this game does need more polish design wise- it have potential and could be tons of fun but right now its lacking; More money coming in more hopes to see the game improving
Didn't know you could put that much stupid into two sentences.