安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
What are you getting on average?
Resolution:.........................1920x1080
Display Mode:.......................Full Screen
Film Grain Amount:..................None
Anti-Aliasing Mode:.................Disabled
Filtering Mode:.....................Bilinear
Vertical Sync:......................Disabled
Shader Detail:......................Very High
Effect Detail:......................High
Texture/Model Detail:...............High
First, this is a post from seven years ago, second is that low effect detail is a bad idea. Not being able to see tank rocks is pretty bad. Keep it at medium.
What if you want to shoot the rock to destroy it but you can't because it's invisible? You see the rock for like half a second before it disappears from view only to reappear suddenly again; This doesn't have to be about you dodging either, it could be a teammate that is in trouble.
By the time the rock reappears there's very little window of opportunity to get out of its way. The risk is not worth the reward imo
Above implies if you're in versus. If you're in campaign then tank rocks are very easy to dodge, the AI is easily fooled by movement.
7 years old post though
Low memory page will make props to be more transparent, giving you a free wallhack, but that will mean you won’t see the tank rock until a moment later.
Higher effect will make the lighting to stand out more, allowing you to catch threats, but then better lighting could also simulate better darkness effect, restricting your vision.