pipithewarz2 Aug 9, 2013 @ 5:47pm
omfg , why did i waste my money on this
I dont know what came over me , i bought this game and ..... oh well ...

its crap
Showing 1-15 of 16 comments
< >
[NSDAP] Hermann Wilhelm Göring Aug 11, 2013 @ 5:20pm 
it is
One DOOMed Marine Aug 16, 2013 @ 4:10pm 
What did you think you were gonna get for freaking $1.00
Count VAC'ular Aug 16, 2013 @ 9:24pm 
What are you talking about;

Positives;
Ultra Realistic Textures
Advanced Shaders
High Poly Models
Engaging Story
Excellent RPG elements
Amazing Multiplayer
Plus the setting is amazing, no other game does it like this

Negatives:
Needs a gaming rig to run properly
pipithewarz2 Aug 19, 2013 @ 2:13pm 
wat ? u mad !?!
NearEquity Aug 19, 2013 @ 6:15pm 
shouldnt have bought it, fruit cake.
テレサ Aug 20, 2013 @ 8:39am 
This Game sucks so hard. Never played ♥♥♥♥ like this. The Size of about 30 MB tells nearly everything. I set everything on max and the graphic still looks like it comes out of a 3D Game Maker. The movement and Gameplay itself is sooo bad...last time i see such a bad Game was Postal 3. DONT BUY !
Cunin Aug 24, 2013 @ 8:57pm 
lol 3D Game Maker...that's probably one of the most offensive sentences you can write about a game XD
Blackout Oct 2, 2013 @ 12:37pm 
i have to agree this game is total ♥♥♥♥t
One DOOMed Marine Oct 2, 2013 @ 6:58pm 
It'd be alright if it was 99 cents er something. But the same price as "The binding of issac"? No way I'd buy this piece of ♥♥♥♥, even if it had free multiplayer.
CLBrown Feb 26 @ 11:48am 
Ah, it's entertaining to watch spoiled children complain about old games not being "uber-super-duper-kewl" in every possible way.

Kiddos, let's be clear about something. When you see an OLD GAME... as the "classic" definition in the name of this one should tell you... you should realize that it was created earlier, and may not be "photorealistic" in every way.

What you are buying here is not "a virtual reality experience comparable to real life." You are BUYING A GAME.

So, the whinging about "bad graphics" on this OLD GAME is just hillarious to me.

Talk about the gameplay. Talk about whether or not it's FUN TO PLAY. (Frankly, most older games are actually MORE FUN... at least the ones you'll see around these days... because without being able to rely on pure visual candy, the writers actually had to create a GAME.)

I find it remarkable to see kids talking about how "bad" the original Half-Life is, or how "bad" the original "Thief - The Dark Project" is... because the enemies and NPC characters don't have perfect, believable facial expressions... in fact, the lips don't even move in THIEF... and thus, the games are "bad."

Nope. If only modern game makers would devote the amount of time those guys did to making an immersive, entertaining GAME... and still would give us the better visuals and so forth which the advances in HARDWARE CAPABILITY permit... we'd be golden. But, instead, you get tripe with "auto-healing when you hide behind a crate" and totally restrictive "paths"... where every player is required to play the game in the exact same way (which means... it's not a GAME, it's just a "timing test" for those with superior reflexes... and doesn't deal with your ability to think and reason, at all!)

This game... well... it's not all that thrilling to me, but mainly because the gameplay is unreasonable. One guy, doing everything, being attacked by dozens of enemies? Running around on an airship, repairing systems and shooting guns? Well, it COULD be fun, but it really needs "a group of friends controlling the airship," with one each on each turret, another one or two tasked with damage/repair, and another steering the ship.

Which is, in large part, what was created by the makers of this game after this (early, and now very inexpensive) version came out... an "online" version where you can do pretty much that (except that you don't get to steer the craft).

It's an OLD GAME. Deal with that. Stop snivveling about how it's not "what I expect from things."

Try playing Pong, or an old Atari 2600... or something on the Apple II or the Commodore 64. Don't know what those things are? Learn. And stop whining, PLEASE.
ϟNGϟ Nova Light May 3 @ 9:47pm 
I think it's a fun game....
dragonheart May 9 @ 10:29am 
Originally posted by CLBrown:
Ah, it's entertaining to watch spoiled children complain about old games not being "uber-super-duper-kewl" in every possible way.

Kiddos, let's be clear about something. When you see an OLD GAME... as the "classic" definition in the name of this one should tell you... you should realize that it was created earlier, and may not be "photorealistic" in every way.

What you are buying here is not "a virtual reality experience comparable to real life." You are BUYING A GAME.

So, the whinging about "bad graphics" on this OLD GAME is just hillarious to me.

Talk about the gameplay. Talk about whether or not it's FUN TO PLAY. (Frankly, most older games are actually MORE FUN... at least the ones you'll see around these days... because without being able to rely on pure visual candy, the writers actually had to create a GAME.)

I find it remarkable to see kids talking about how "bad" the original Half-Life is, or how "bad" the original "Thief - The Dark Project" is... because the enemies and NPC characters don't have perfect, believable facial expressions... in fact, the lips don't even move in THIEF... and thus, the games are "bad."

Nope. If only modern game makers would devote the amount of time those guys did to making an immersive, entertaining GAME... and still would give us the better visuals and so forth which the advances in HARDWARE CAPABILITY permit... we'd be golden. But, instead, you get tripe with "auto-healing when you hide behind a crate" and totally restrictive "paths"... where every player is required to play the game in the exact same way (which means... it's not a GAME, it's just a "timing test" for those with superior reflexes... and doesn't deal with your ability to think and reason, at all!)

This game... well... it's not all that thrilling to me, but mainly because the gameplay is unreasonable. One guy, doing everything, being attacked by dozens of enemies? Running around on an airship, repairing systems and shooting guns? Well, it COULD be fun, but it really needs "a group of friends controlling the airship," with one each on each turret, another one or two tasked with damage/repair, and another steering the ship.

Which is, in large part, what was created by the makers of this game after this (early, and now very inexpensive) version came out... an "online" version where you can do pretty much that (except that you don't get to steer the craft).

It's an OLD GAME. Deal with that. Stop snivveling about how it's not "what I expect from things."

Try playing Pong, or an old Atari 2600... or something on the Apple II or the Commodore 64. Don't know what those things are? Learn. And stop whining, PLEASE.

i totally agree to this message.
try something like myst or quake. in that time they were the high res omg graphics,
they still play pretty good and are still fun at this day. dont look at graphics man look at the gameplay and the fun you can get out of it.
One DOOMed Marine May 9 @ 12:37pm 
Originally posted by dragonheart:
Originally posted by CLBrown:
Ah, it's entertaining to watch spoiled children complain about old games not being "uber-super-duper-kewl" in every possible way.

Kiddos, let's be clear about something. When you see an OLD GAME... as the "classic" definition in the name of this one should tell you... you should realize that it was created earlier, and may not be "photorealistic" in every way.

What you are buying here is not "a virtual reality experience comparable to real life." You are BUYING A GAME.

So, the whinging about "bad graphics" on this OLD GAME is just hillarious to me.

Talk about the gameplay. Talk about whether or not it's FUN TO PLAY. (Frankly, most older games are actually MORE FUN... at least the ones you'll see around these days... because without being able to rely on pure visual candy, the writers actually had to create a GAME.)

I find it remarkable to see kids talking about how "bad" the original Half-Life is, or how "bad" the original "Thief - The Dark Project" is... because the enemies and NPC characters don't have perfect, believable facial expressions... in fact, the lips don't even move in THIEF... and thus, the games are "bad."

Nope. If only modern game makers would devote the amount of time those guys did to making an immersive, entertaining GAME... and still would give us the better visuals and so forth which the advances in HARDWARE CAPABILITY permit... we'd be golden. But, instead, you get tripe with "auto-healing when you hide behind a crate" and totally restrictive "paths"... where every player is required to play the game in the exact same way (which means... it's not a GAME, it's just a "timing test" for those with superior reflexes... and doesn't deal with your ability to think and reason, at all!)

This game... well... it's not all that thrilling to me, but mainly because the gameplay is unreasonable. One guy, doing everything, being attacked by dozens of enemies? Running around on an airship, repairing systems and shooting guns? Well, it COULD be fun, but it really needs "a group of friends controlling the airship," with one each on each turret, another one or two tasked with damage/repair, and another steering the ship.

Which is, in large part, what was created by the makers of this game after this (early, and now very inexpensive) version came out... an "online" version where you can do pretty much that (except that you don't get to steer the craft).

It's an OLD GAME. Deal with that. Stop snivveling about how it's not "what I expect from things."

Try playing Pong, or an old Atari 2600... or something on the Apple II or the Commodore 64. Don't know what those things are? Learn. And stop whining, PLEASE.

i totally agree to this message.
try something like myst or quake. in that time they were the high res omg graphics,
they still play pretty good and are still fun at this day. dont look at graphics man look at the gameplay and the fun you can get out of it.
True, but the gameplay is like a flash game.
flamingpanda509 May 16 @ 10:49am 
your not wrong about people complaining bout graphics the only reaso n i bought it was for onling and i loved the origonal half-life games but this game promised online and it doesent work and btw its not that old a game
One DOOMed Marine May 16 @ 1:56pm 
Originally posted by flamingpanda509:
your not wrong about people complaining bout graphics the only reaso n i bought it was for onling and i loved the origonal half-life games but this game promised online and it doesent work and btw its not that old a game
:solitude:
This has nothing to do with half life...
Showing 1-15 of 16 comments
< >
Per page: 15 30 50