Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
Its noit the IGPU, but your CPU.
Itso nly up to 2.6 GHZ when you really need at least 3.2+ GHZ.
I used 3570K's HD 4000 and I gotten no less then 40 FPS on medium.
His CPU is a laptop cpu.
You think thats not the problem? :/...
iF so your obviously wrong. If you say I dont know what I am talking about, please fill me in instead fo saying differently.
Alaso I notice this is your only post here. Do a quick search.
NS2's spark engine has been CPU bound for since ever.
I also notice you apparantly have 400 hours in a game. Does that mean you know more then me? ... lol
It also seems to me, by looking at your post, that you seem to judge "MORE CORES IS BETTER".
You don't have a dedicated graphics card, as is officially required.
Linux has to run open gl which is still in beta for ns2 and doesn't perform as well
Your cpu could be a whole lot better..
Basically, your hardware is not what most would consider to be pc gaming hardware.
Type r_stats in the console to see whether you are gpu or cpu bound, by observing the "waiting for gpu" line
Also dont know if youjr aware, but the U models often have lower speed :/ Its 30 % slower then the QM model...
Also, It cant be a bottleneck since he uses his ONBOARD,, and bottlenecking doesnt result in 1 FPS. It results in spikes and stuttering.
Got a i5-2380p and a HD7850OC, and it runs @ 70 fps on high.
It's not only the CPU, it must be (mainly) due to the absence of a GPU.
I am sorry but what? Do you even realise his CPU
Go compare:
Phenom 995 vs your laptop?
Heck, Go compare, FX 4100 vs your laptop.
On games like:
NS2
PS2
Unreal Tournament 3 engine games.
Do that?
Garantee a 50+ FPS difference.
Here is a guy with an OCd i7 CPU with the same intel HD 4000 and getting 15 fps...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKNeFornYPU
And "Easily run NS2" means playable FPS to you, or just being able to run it??
Because i don't consider 20 fps as you mentioned to be playable... not even remotely.
He is getting 1-2 fps for the 3 reasons i already listed.
Normal mode, core @ 920 MHz and mem @ 1250 Mhz, around 60 fps in the menu
Low speed, core @ 460 MHz and mem @ 625 MHz, 30 fps in menu
O/C, core @ 1050 MHz and mem @ 1450, 75 fps in menu.
I would support that it's the fact he has no dedicated GPU.
Besides the fact that i have not seen anybody achieve even 40 fps in an actual NS2 game with an igpu.. I wouldn't say 40 fps is "playable" for most FPS games.. let alone a fast, competitive, twitch, niche and hardcore indie FPS..
Therefore yes, I do believe you need a dedicated GPU for this game.
But hey, if you get it to play and are happy with that degree of frame rate.. good on ya, enjoy. :)
Damn you killed basic English here.
I'm just baffled that you actually believe that 20FPS in the absolute best circumstances is an acceptably playable framerate in a competitive team-based multiplayer game. Especially one like NS2.