Team Fortress 2 > 一般討論 > 主題細節
The stonewall Defense 2013 02 月 6 @ 9:34上午
New sapper idea the hacker
Well really it is simple a sapper that hacks buildings and turns them against their team the downsides are that the time it takes to hack the sentry is the same amount of time it takes to normally destroy a sentry.
顯示 1-15,共 47 則回應
< >
20 Sentry Fox 2013 02 月 6 @ 9:37上午 
Pardon, what's the downside?
Jetty 2013 02 月 6 @ 9:40上午 
Yeah because Engineer being vulnerable by his own sentry isn't enough
{λ³} گοηυ 2013 02 月 6 @ 11:25上午 
ROYAL_CHAIRFORCE 發表:
Pardon, what's the downside?
The downside is that the time it takes for the sentry to switch sides is the same as the time it would take a normal sapper to destroy it.
templarrr 2013 02 月 6 @ 11:27上午 
Sοηυ 發表:
ROYAL_CHAIRFORCE 發表:
Pardon, what's the downside?
The downside is that the time it takes for the sentry to switch sides is the same as the time it would take a normal sapper to destroy it.

How is that a downside if it's identical to normal sapper behavior?

Also, this is a very OP sapper idea. Just think of the damage a turned level 3 sentry could do... with next to no effort on the spy's part to pull it off.
20 Sentry Fox 2013 02 月 6 @ 11:29上午 
Sοηυ 發表:
The downside is that the time it takes for the sentry to switch sides is the same as the time it would take a normal sapper to destroy it.
Where exactly is the downside in that?
A team-switched Sentry >>> a destroyed Sentry, and if both can be done within the same time what reason is there to use the regular Sapper?
{λ³} گοηυ 2013 02 月 6 @ 11:35上午 
The Last Templar 發表:
Sοηυ 發表:
The downside is that the time it takes for the sentry to switch sides is the same as the time it would take a normal sapper to destroy it.

How is that a downside if it's identical to normal sapper behavior?
Technically, it's not a downside that'd be written on the weapon's stats, but if the sapper was destroyed, the hack wouldn't work and nothing would happen, whereas with the sapper there'd be damage done that the engie would have to repair.

Well, that's what I'm assuming he means anyway. Not taking any sides here, just interpreting OP so don't shout at me about it.
Shadow_Aide 2013 02 月 6 @ 12:08下午 
It would be really useful on Dispensers and the affect on Teleporters would be to switch the Entrance and Exit (reverses the flow).
Punchy 2013 02 月 6 @ 12:31下午 
When hacked, sentry turns into a mini sentry.
Soundpulse (banned) 2013 02 月 6 @ 12:32下午 
A Level 3 sentry attacking it's team would be too overpowered. I say it goes down to either Level 1 or 2, to make it a bit more fair.
Matobito 發表:
When hacked, sentry turns into a mini sentry.
This could work too.
Enigmantic 2013 02 月 6 @ 12:40下午 
SprocketGearshift 發表:
Well really it is simple a sapper that hacks buildings and turns them against their team the downsides are that the time it takes to hack the sentry is the same amount of time it takes to normally destroy a sentry.
I play as engie quite often and this idea makes me shudder. I already have to make sure I'm not standing in front of the sentry if it starts firing at approaching enemies and I'm not sure if I'd like to have to worry about having it turned against me and my teammates.
Shadow_Aide 2013 02 月 6 @ 12:46下午 
It would be more acceptable if Sentries would have to revert to either mini-sentries or 1st level sentries.
Leonardo Coxington 2013 02 月 6 @ 1:02下午 
Obviously OP, I can't imagine any downside that would balance this (besides making the sentry do a HELL OF LESS DAMAGE, but even then there would be no point to using it).
Mr. Turtle (#ThugLyfe) 2013 02 月 6 @ 1:06下午 
Whatta bout the Wrangeler?
Major Havoc 2013 02 月 6 @ 1:07下午 
That idea might be good if it required another engineer to work with the Spy to hack.
But to tell you the truth, I do believe that the Red Tape Recorder is a hacking device.
Shadow_Aide 2013 02 月 6 @ 1:14下午 
Yeah the Red Tape Recorder is but one version of hacking device. There should be other types with different affects.
顯示 1-15,共 47 則回應
< >
每頁: 15 30 50
張貼日期: 2013 02 月 6 @ 9:34上午
回覆: 47