登录
|
语言
Български(保加利亚语)
čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
English(英语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Français(法语)
Deutsch(德语)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Italiano(意大利语)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语-巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Español(西班牙语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
繁體中文(繁体中文)
ไทย(泰语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
帮助我们翻译 Steam



For starters, people will begin abusing vehicles, running people over, they will be glitchy, and not a single map ive played would be sufficient to hold ONE vehicle.
I run at max quality, and sometimes hl2.exe does not respond because of that, and adding vehicles will just make my TF2 hopelessly laggy. and no, i cant turn down the settings because no-one beats the smile of a heavy.
Many classes would become HOPELESS, spy backstabbing a truck? nu-huh no chance. Sniper sniping a tank? fat chance. you see where im going?
Its a nice idea, but by my standarts, its impractical.
except, you know, all of them
This
Scout=He could outrun the vehicles and shoot the driver then hijack the car.
Sniper could snipe the driving when the car stops or crashes
Heavy+ could survive being run over and continuosly shoot the vehicle resulting in its destruction
pyro= could set the car alight
Soldier= could hit the car with a rocket, toppling it over
medic= Nothing really, but the car can't have too many dangers.
Demoman= similar to soldier
Engineer= could shoot the car down with his sentry.
Spy, could sap the engine (takes one whole minute, to let the player get out and remove the sapper)
Inventing counters to vehicles don't justify their existence, lol. TF2 was designed without vehicles. Adding them would mess up class balance by removing the weaknesses of many classes and forcing teams to deal with a new threat that has no relevance to the objective-based gameplay. That's so obvious that I believe you're just "trolling" at this point.