Team Fortress 2 > 一般討論 > 主題細節
2↓st Sentry Gentleman 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 12 時 48 分
Slight Changes to the Diamondback
Alright, since I guess all of us agree that the Diamondback is a bit oversituational to make for a decent sidegrade to stand alongside the Revolver and the Ambassador as it stands here are 2 tiny things that, in my opinion, could be done to fix this:

Turn the damage penalty into a rate-of-fire penalty.

This would
  • increase burst damage to stock level
  • make the crits 15% stronger
  • and make tracking your target easier
all without changing the current damage/time output.

Give it Enforcer-like accuracy.

And by that I mean the Enforcer's
  • ~25% faster spread recovery.

Not only is it frustrating to see your hard-earned crits randomspread into nothingness, additional accuracy would also make for a nice stand-alone perk for when sap-able buildings are scarce, especially in combination with the reduced rate of fire giving you more time to aim between 2 shots.


Just a cerebral hiccup of mine..
What's your opinion? Would these changes be a step in the right direction?
最後修改者:2↓st Sentry Gentleman; 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 2 時 51 分
顯示 1-14,共 14 則回應
< >
Tim Timsen (已封鎖) 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 12 時 53 分 
I kind of agree, I'd use it more often if it was a little stronger.
I only use it for showing off in trade servers atm.
Bishreksual 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 12 時 57 分 
This would be great, the Diamondback has needed a buff since it was first released, practically the only reason to use it over the other revolvers is it's badass look and sound.
System 32 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 12 時 59 分 
I wouldn't mind if this happened, theres really no big reason to use it, but if this happened I would use it.
It would basically be an Ambassador with situational crits instead of headshots
最後修改者:System 32; 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 1 時 00 分
abs 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 1 時 01 分 
Yeah, it's been a long time that i gave up on this revolver, the concept is also bad designed. Could use a change of it
Gangrene Toe Loss 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 1 時 14 分 
You do know that all revolvers share the Ambassador's accuracy attribute, right? The only difference being the Ambassador actually shows when it'll hit spot on by use of the crosshair. I believe you need to wait approximately 1.5 seconds between shots.
Nuclear Kangaroo 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 1 時 25 分 
just give me 2 crits for each destroyed building and im happy
Das Kätzchen 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 1 時 52 分 
My only problem with it is that it's crap in MvM unless there's Robot Engineers. If they made it so that it got crits when you destroyed a Robot via Sapper, I would be fine with it.
Note: Yes, I understand this is completely irrelevant to the topic of the main game.
最後修改者:Das Kätzchen; 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 1 時 53 分
Tin Foil Hat 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 2 時 02 分 
Yeah the only time i used it was when engineers spam mini sentries, really only used it to combat Frontier Crits. Other than that i didnt use it, soo i scrapped it :P Been working hard at trying to get better with my Ambassador.
最後修改者:Tin Foil Hat; 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 2 時 02 分
abs 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 2 時 03 分 
ThisLD FirePyro192 發表:
My only problem with it is that it's crap in MvM unless there's Robot Engineers. If they made it so that it got crits when you destroyed a Robot via Sapper, I would be fine with it.
Note: Yes, I understand this is completely irrelevant to the topic of the main game.
It's a good point to show how this weapon completely makes it way too underpowered in every aspect.
2↓st Sentry Gentleman 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 2 時 52 分 
The Crit-Magnet Brony 發表:
You do know that all revolvers share the Ambassador's accuracy attribute, right? The only difference being the Ambassador actually shows when it'll hit spot on by use of the crosshair. I believe you need to wait approximately 1.5 seconds between shots.
Ah my bad, I picked the wrong gun.
Fixed.
Apple Plum Banana Face 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 3 時 59 分 
I love the first option. The Diamondback was supposed to be able to one-shot an engineer with a crit in the first place.
Land Mantis 2013 年 01 月 29 日 @ 下午 7 時 47 分 
I agree with this, the Diamondback would be a nice and viable weapon if the reward of it wasn't so meager and situational.
-W3E- Dat Jane Doe 2013 年 01 月 29 日 @ 下午 7 時 50 分 
I see spies attacking engies while sapping buildings rather than after its destroyed so I would suggest:
No random crits
-20% slower firing rate
-Deals minicrits while having an active sapper
Apple Plum Banana Face 2013 年 01 月 29 日 @ 下午 8 時 05 分 
thinklogic 發表:
I see spies attacking engies while sapping buildings rather than after its destroyed so I would suggest:
No random crits
-20% slower firing rate
-Deals minicrits while having an active sapper
No, let's keep the crits like they are.
顯示 1-14,共 14 則回應
< >
每頁: 15 30 50
張貼日期: 2013 年 01 月 27 日 @ 下午 12 時 48 分
回覆: 14