Team Fortress 2 > 일반 토론 > 제목 정보
21st Sentry Gentleman 2013년 1월 27일 오후 12시 48분
Slight Changes to the Diamondback
Alright, since I guess all of us agree that the Diamondback is a bit oversituational to make for a decent sidegrade to stand alongside the Revolver and the Ambassador as it stands here are 2 tiny things that, in my opinion, could be done to fix this:

Turn the damage penalty into a rate-of-fire penalty.

This would
  • increase burst damage to stock level
  • make the crits 15% stronger
  • and make tracking your target easier
all without changing the current damage/time output.

Give it Enforcer-like accuracy.

And by that I mean the Enforcer's
  • ~25% faster spread recovery.

Not only is it frustrating to see your hard-earned crits randomspread into nothingness, additional accuracy would also make for a nice stand-alone perk for when sap-able buildings are scarce, especially in combination with the reduced rate of fire giving you more time to aim between 2 shots.


Just a cerebral hiccup of mine..
What's your opinion? Would these changes be a step in the right direction?
21st Sentry Gentleman님이 마지막으로 수정; 2013년 1월 27일 오후 2시 51분
14개 중 1-14 표시중
< >
Tim Timsen (차단됨) 2013년 1월 27일 오후 12시 53분 
I kind of agree, I'd use it more often if it was a little stronger.
I only use it for showing off in trade servers atm.
Bishreksual 2013년 1월 27일 오후 12시 57분 
This would be great, the Diamondback has needed a buff since it was first released, practically the only reason to use it over the other revolvers is it's badass look and sound.
System 32 2013년 1월 27일 오후 12시 59분 
I wouldn't mind if this happened, theres really no big reason to use it, but if this happened I would use it.
It would basically be an Ambassador with situational crits instead of headshots
System 32님이 마지막으로 수정; 2013년 1월 27일 오후 1시 00분
Jetty [Brazil] 2013년 1월 27일 오후 1시 01분 
Yeah, it's been a long time that i gave up on this revolver, the concept is also bad designed. Could use a change of it
Gangrene Toe Loss 2013년 1월 27일 오후 1시 14분 
You do know that all revolvers share the Ambassador's accuracy attribute, right? The only difference being the Ambassador actually shows when it'll hit spot on by use of the crosshair. I believe you need to wait approximately 1.5 seconds between shots.
Nuclear Kangaroo 2013년 1월 27일 오후 1시 25분 
just give me 2 crits for each destroyed building and im happy
Sodium Chloride 2013년 1월 27일 오후 1시 52분 
My only problem with it is that it's crap in MvM unless there's Robot Engineers. If they made it so that it got crits when you destroyed a Robot via Sapper, I would be fine with it.
Note: Yes, I understand this is completely irrelevant to the topic of the main game.
Sodium Chloride님이 마지막으로 수정; 2013년 1월 27일 오후 1시 53분
Tin Foil Hat 2013년 1월 27일 오후 2시 02분 
Yeah the only time i used it was when engineers spam mini sentries, really only used it to combat Frontier Crits. Other than that i didnt use it, soo i scrapped it :P Been working hard at trying to get better with my Ambassador.
Tin Foil Hat님이 마지막으로 수정; 2013년 1월 27일 오후 2시 02분
Jetty [Brazil] 2013년 1월 27일 오후 2시 03분 
ThisLD FirePyro192님이 먼저 게시:
My only problem with it is that it's crap in MvM unless there's Robot Engineers. If they made it so that it got crits when you destroyed a Robot via Sapper, I would be fine with it.
Note: Yes, I understand this is completely irrelevant to the topic of the main game.
It's a good point to show how this weapon completely makes it way too underpowered in every aspect.
21st Sentry Gentleman 2013년 1월 27일 오후 2시 52분 
The Crit-Magnet Brony님이 먼저 게시:
You do know that all revolvers share the Ambassador's accuracy attribute, right? The only difference being the Ambassador actually shows when it'll hit spot on by use of the crosshair. I believe you need to wait approximately 1.5 seconds between shots.
Ah my bad, I picked the wrong gun.
Fixed.
Foxy the Pirate 2013년 1월 27일 오후 3시 59분 
I love the first option. The Diamondback was supposed to be able to one-shot an engineer with a crit in the first place.
Land Mantis 2013년 1월 29일 오후 7시 47분 
I agree with this, the Diamondback would be a nice and viable weapon if the reward of it wasn't so meager and situational.
-W3E- Dat Jane Doe 2013년 1월 29일 오후 7시 50분 
I see spies attacking engies while sapping buildings rather than after its destroyed so I would suggest:
No random crits
-20% slower firing rate
-Deals minicrits while having an active sapper
Foxy the Pirate 2013년 1월 29일 오후 8시 05분 
thinklogic님이 먼저 게시:
I see spies attacking engies while sapping buildings rather than after its destroyed so I would suggest:
No random crits
-20% slower firing rate
-Deals minicrits while having an active sapper
No, let's keep the crits like they are.
14개 중 1-14 표시중
< >
페이지당: 15 30 50
게시된 날짜: 2013년 1월 27일 오후 12시 48분
게시글: 14