Metro: Last Light > Dyskusje ogólne > Szczegóły tematu
=(e)= Rastaknight 8 Lis, 2013 - 14:34
better/longer?
is this one any longer than the first one? i beat 2033 in 10 hours and was quite dissapointed..
Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5 komentarzy
< >
Tripoteur Ventripotent 8 Lis, 2013 - 15:08 
I don't remember how long the first one was exactly, but I did complete Last Light in roughly 10-12 hours, so I'd say it's pretty short.

The quality's off the charts, though. Amazing environments, more events, all gorgeous.

I think these games were meant to be replayed in different ways. Like the first game, there's two endings in this one, and often multiple ways to get through situations. If you're into achievements, some of them are tricky and will keep you playing for a long time.

If you just like tons of content, this might not be for you... or you might want to wait a couple years and pick it up for ten bucks or whatever it'll be then.
=(e)= Rastaknight 8 Lis, 2013 - 15:25 
thankyou, i already got it for close to ten bucks not that long back :P
chroniz 8 Lis, 2013 - 15:45 
If you're not rushing things, I'd say it's a few hours longer than 2033. I played through both games consecutively last week - spent around 11 hours on 2033 and 15 on LL.
CursedPanther 10 Lis, 2013 - 18:18 
The only way you can get 20-30 hours out of a singleplayer experience is with sandbox games these days.
Ostatnio edytowany przez: CursedPanther; 10 Lis, 2013 - 18:18
=(e)= Rastaknight 11 Lis, 2013 - 4:59 
yeahh.. its quite unfortunate
Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5 komentarzy
< >
Na stronę: 15 30 50
Data napisania: 8 Lis, 2013 - 14:34
Posty: 5