waterbag23jb Jul 2, 2013 @ 6:21pm
Total War: Rome or this??
I really like total war series. Rome is the best. Does this compare? looks cool.. is it worth buying ??
Showing 1-10 of 10 comments
< >
Mad_Irishman Jul 15, 2013 @ 9:06pm 
I think you might be better off waiting for Total War Rome 2 if you enjoy the series.
FroggyGodFriend Aug 6, 2013 @ 12:59am 
I have played a couple of Total War titles and have found the combat more difficult and not as fun as it is in The Kings' Crusade.
The combat in TKC is more like the combat in the King Arthur series, which I also enjoyed. In fact I purchased the Total War games because I like KA so much.
I'm not sure why the combat differs so much as all three games are based on the same game engine.
Anethos Aug 13, 2013 @ 12:55pm 
Do not buy this game buggy as hell. The developers who made it abandoned it.
大名 Takeda Yabusame Sep 16, 2013 @ 10:36pm 
Hmmmm They are both good and cheap, just get both of them =P
fleetlordatvar Nov 13, 2013 @ 4:49pm 
Go with Total Wars, no contest! NOT woth buying this game, mine was free!
v1.03 still has bugs & no further update expected as the dev abandoned the game almost two years ago e.g. no support
Last edited by fleetlordatvar; Nov 13, 2013 @ 11:06pm
abdlfatah1 Dec 24, 2013 @ 8:14pm 
total war is better this game crashes and buggy but i do like the storyline and the upgrading of armor from the enemy and all
Corpison Dec 30, 2013 @ 7:41am 
Total War 2 is a money pit. Anyone who buys it is contributing to the problem. $59.99 for the game, 14.99 for countless expansions that were already finished at release and then... you want a new army that was already in the coding at release? $2.99 please. I used to be a fan of the series until they went this route. Not buying anymore total war products. I'll try Kings Crusade instead. At least it's reasonable.
Tegga21 Jan 16 @ 11:04am 
This. Total war has gone to garbage.

Originally posted by Corpison:
Total War 2 is a money pit. Anyone who buys it is contributing to the problem. $59.99 for the game, 14.99 for countless expansions that were already finished at release and then... you want a new army that was already in the coding at release? $2.99 please. I used to be a fan of the series until they went this route. Not buying anymore total war products. I'll try Kings Crusade instead. At least it's reasonable.
mastergun Apr 4 @ 7:30pm 
I would vote Total War : Rome due to the better quality ( no crashing ). I do like the combat and upgrading of leader units in King's Crusade but the crashing at end of numerous battles is extremely frustrating.
Rex Bellator Jun 19 @ 9:44pm 
The only thing that has gone to garbage is the gaming community surrounding Total War and the sniveling snot-nosed gamers who feel they are entitled to things like free DLC. Sorry kids, DLC is the current model for modern game development, no one should be mad at CA for simply following the trend that 99 percent of all other game developers are going. This is a business, not a charity.

Rome 2 is a fantastic game and eclipses Rome 1, and most of the previous entries in the series, save for Shogun 2 and Empire. The only people who say otherwise are nostalgia-addled idiots who fail to see how Rome 1's major flaws, flaws like non-existent diplomacy, useless units, broken squalor/population system, horrible faction color choices, and repetitive battles the vast majority of which are siege battles which all play out the same.

Rome 2 may have some issues, more when it first launched, but the game has been improved exponentially since launch. Battle AI continues to surprise me, siege AI has improved and I've seen it win battles. Faction AI is intelligent and cunning. The entire strategic map is a living breathing world, unlike Rome 1's RISK-style board game played by ♥♥♥♥♥ic AI that declares war on you the moment you share a border.

I know kids, I know, it's hard to face the truth... but the truth shall set you free.
Showing 1-10 of 10 comments
< >
Per page: 15 30 50