The gun play is decent and it has that same serious Sam's charm and humor. but they really dropped the ball with level design and the pacing of the game.
i always find myself getting lost in the map and it really ruins the pacing of the game for me , games like this thrive with more straight forward and non-maze like levels not a giant ass map.

I understand now that why First encounter and the second encounter are considered the best in the series, because of their magnificent level design and the good pacing of it. which makes them hell of a lot more replayable i don't remember if i've ♥♥♥♥♥♥ lost in their map at all. hell i enjoyed ss2 more than this.

before anyone suggest i view FE and SE with nostalgia , i want to clarify that i'm not a long time player of this franchise.i played the first encounter briefly as a kid for couple of hours , but i wasn't skilled at shooters back then, so i set it aside until now. and surprisingly i find more enjoyment with them and even ss2 than modern titles

I'd recommend playing it through once , but personally , i don't find it compelling enough for replay value , feel free to make your own choice , but i , for one, don't find it worth revising and i wish there was a mixed review button but there is not , and also ♥♥♥♥ those annoying ass monkeys , worst enemy design ever.

Better than Duke Nukem forever

★☆☆☆☆ Terrible!


First of all, I'll start with the graphics. I really like them! That's something that made me really want to play this game. But no, that's the only good thing about the game.

The old Serious Sam were fun, with great variety of levels amount and design. The new game is just pathetic. It starts for a short time at a city, has a bit of cave levels and ends in the desert. Before you had jungles, Egypt levels, you had puzzles, you had secret levels with islands and so on. This game is just too short and boring. It reminds you a bit of the old one, it has better graphics, but the gameplay can be compared to 40% of the old one's. It has great potential, but bad investment. It feels like the developers didn't put enough effort on it.

To be honest, the first time I was playing this game, the moment where I got really excited was at the last level! And then, for my disappointment I realized that I was playing the last level. Yes if you want to complete the levels at 100% it will take you some time (some levels around an hour), but the levels are few. It's even possible to run through the levels, kill 60% of the monsters and finish the game.

Halo is Infinite, Doom is Eternal, but SAM IS SERIOUS!

çok severek oynamıştım. serious sam 4 ü de satın aldım ama oynanışı grafikleri vs hiç beğenmedim. ikisinden birini almak isteyen varsa 3'ü almasını öneririrm.

çok eğlenceli bir oyun

Well, after SS2, SS3 is personally a bit disappointing. It's not outright bad, but it's definitely blander and it also feels like there was much less passion behind it. It simply feels very "designed by corporate board", it's at best a half-hearted attempt to make something entertaining. It does manage to hold onto at least some of the Serious Sam DNA, but it's very subdued overall. It also has several sections that feel like some asset flip early access cashgrab scam, except it has Serious Sam enemies in it.

It's still a good game and it has many fun to play parts, but it's definitely less enjoyable than its predecessors, less memorable too - I still remember some parts of the original First Encounter and Second Encounter and SS2 as well, but I don't remember anything from SS3 and I played it much more recently than the older games. It has less "soul", it feels like it was made because there were contractual obligations, not because the devs wanted to make it.

Помню играл в нее в году 2014-2015
Хорошие были деньки

I've mainly been doing the multiplayer with buddies, and it's a lot of fun!

Eh.