Kisho 2013年9月20日下午7:01
Type 38 and Type 99
Which one is better ? I enjoy using them both and don't see the difference.
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 16 条留言
< >
Moskeeto 2013年9月20日下午7:02 
It doesn't really matter. The Type 38 has a slightly more accurate flight path and the Type 99 has a slightly more powerful shot. It's really just up to which iron sight you prefer.
Sil.^ 2013年9月21日上午9:03 
I feel that the type 99 is better. Even though the type 38 has a nice iron sight. But thats just because sometimes I feel that that the type 38 often just harms the other player at longer ranges, whereas the type 99 is more powerful and seems to kill easier.
Quincy Jones 2013年9月21日上午9:23 
IMO the Type99 has significantly more damage. This also holds true for the MG's too. The type 38 uses the 6.5Arisaka, the Type99 uses the 7.7Arisaka. I think the 6.5 has a slightly flatter trajectory and faster flight, but it doesnt really matter that much, as the difference is only about 100fps, and the damage makes a bigger difference. I like the sights on both the type39 and 99 so that doesnt matter much to me, I think the 6.5 might chamber slightly faster as well.

最后由 Quincy Jones 编辑于; 2013年9月21日上午9:24
Mr. Internet Troll 2013年9月21日下午12:21 
Type 99 blocks my vision too much. I got used to the handling of the type 38 through knee mortar'ing.

needless to say, despite the M1 Carbine being a much better weapon, its sights makes it almost useless, especially if you have a pistol on you for close range fighting.
<{.:[Hellfire]:.}>Odyssey-☭RUS 2013年9月21日下午5:52 
引用自 Y.O.B.A.
Type 99 blocks my vision too much. I got used to the handling of the type 38 through knee mortar'ing.

needless to say, despite the M1 Carbine being a much better weapon, its sights makes it almost useless, especially if you have a pistol on you for close range fighting.
My thoughts exactly on the type 38 and m1 Carbine
Beyond Human 2013年9月21日下午6:14 
Type 38 has better sights but the type 99 does more damage.
最后由 Beyond Human 编辑于; 2013年9月21日下午6:15
Kc 2013年9月21日下午6:14 
Type 99 is better. I remember playing with the 38 and it was too damn frustrating hitting someone and then hearing the bandage sound. Such a crappy bolt action rifle. At least the first one was more like an Enfield, and it is pretty good actually.
Beyond Human 2013年9月21日下午6:15 
引用自 Mahoney
Type 99 is better. I remember playing with the 38 and it was too damn frustrating hitting someone and then hearing the bandage sound. Such a crappy bolt action rifle. At least the first one was more like an Enfield, and it is pretty good actually.
Type 38 is fine if you go for head shots.
Kc 2013年9月21日下午6:17 
引用自 The Monkey King
引用自 Mahoney
Type 99 is better. I remember playing with the 38 and it was too damn frustrating hitting someone and then hearing the bandage sound. Such a crappy bolt action rifle. At least the first one was more like an Enfield, and it is pretty good actually.
Type 38 is fine if you go for head shots.
Every weapon is fine if you go for headshots, especially in this game.
Beyond Human 2013年9月21日下午6:31 
引用自 Mahoney
引用自 The Monkey King
Type 38 is fine if you go for head shots.
Every weapon is fine if you go for headshots, especially in this game.
Did I mention the type 38 also can be used as a walking stick, a spear and every type 38 is autographed by Hideki Tojo?
最后由 Beyond Human 编辑于; 2013年9月21日下午6:31
Kc 2013年9月21日下午6:33 
引用自 The Monkey King
引用自 Mahoney
Every weapon is fine if you go for headshots, especially in this game.
Did I mention the type 38 also can be used as a walking stick, a spear and every type 38 is autographed by Hideki Tojo?
Haha :P It also has better sights, but I prefer the 1 bullet = 1 empty chest type.
Thulsa 2013年9月21日下午8:59 
m1carbine is garbage.
Leonardo 2013年9月22日上午1:40 
In WW II, type 38 is a nice bolt-action rifle in Chinese front-line because of its much better workmanship than Chinese weapons. Japanese soldiers are good at maintain their weapons that Chines soldier especilly the ones fighting in enermy's occupied zone can get a much better rifle than they owns originally when they kill a Japanese soldier successfully. Even in 1960s, Chinese militia still equiped type 38.
Leonardo 2013年9月22日上午1:47 
引用自 Quincy Jones
IMO the Type99 has significantly more damage. This also holds true for the MG's too. The type 38 uses the 6.5Arisaka, the Type99 uses the 7.7Arisaka. I think the 6.5 has a slightly flatter trajectory and faster flight, but it doesnt really matter that much, as the difference is only about 100fps, and the damage makes a bigger difference. I like the sights on both the type39 and 99 so that doesnt matter much to me, I think the 6.5 might chamber slightly faster as well.
No, 7.7Arisaka has the faster flight. 6.5Arisaka's muzzle velocity is about 740m/s when it's fired by type 38.
헿으헿 2013年9月22日上午3:59 
Type 99 is good.
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 16 条留言
< >
每页显示数: 15 30 50
发帖日期: 2013年9月20日下午7:01
帖子数: 16