Kisho 20 сен, 2013 @ 19:01
Type 38 and Type 99
Which one is better ? I enjoy using them both and don't see the difference.
Показано 115 из 16 комментариев
< >
Moskeeto 20 сен, 2013 @ 19:02 
It doesn't really matter. The Type 38 has a slightly more accurate flight path and the Type 99 has a slightly more powerful shot. It's really just up to which iron sight you prefer.
Sil.^ 21 сен, 2013 @ 9:03 
I feel that the type 99 is better. Even though the type 38 has a nice iron sight. But thats just because sometimes I feel that that the type 38 often just harms the other player at longer ranges, whereas the type 99 is more powerful and seems to kill easier.
Quincy Jones 21 сен, 2013 @ 9:23 
IMO the Type99 has significantly more damage. This also holds true for the MG's too. The type 38 uses the 6.5Arisaka, the Type99 uses the 7.7Arisaka. I think the 6.5 has a slightly flatter trajectory and faster flight, but it doesnt really matter that much, as the difference is only about 100fps, and the damage makes a bigger difference. I like the sights on both the type39 and 99 so that doesnt matter much to me, I think the 6.5 might chamber slightly faster as well.

Последний раз отредактировал Quincy Jones; 21 сен, 2013 @ 9:24
Random Guy 21 сен, 2013 @ 12:21 
Type 99 blocks my vision too much. I got used to the handling of the type 38 through knee mortar'ing.

needless to say, despite the M1 Carbine being a much better weapon, its sights makes it almost useless, especially if you have a pistol on you for close range fighting.
Whiskey_Fox 21 сен, 2013 @ 17:52 
Изначально опубликовано Y.O.B.A.:
Type 99 blocks my vision too much. I got used to the handling of the type 38 through knee mortar'ing.

needless to say, despite the M1 Carbine being a much better weapon, its sights makes it almost useless, especially if you have a pistol on you for close range fighting.
My thoughts exactly on the type 38 and m1 Carbine
Angry Hobbit 21 сен, 2013 @ 18:14 
Type 38 has better sights but the type 99 does more damage.
Последний раз отредактировал Angry Hobbit; 21 сен, 2013 @ 18:15
Iceage 21 сен, 2013 @ 18:14 
Type 99 is better. I remember playing with the 38 and it was too damn frustrating hitting someone and then hearing the bandage sound. Such a crappy bolt action rifle. At least the first one was more like an Enfield, and it is pretty good actually.
Angry Hobbit 21 сен, 2013 @ 18:15 
Изначально опубликовано Mahoney:
Type 99 is better. I remember playing with the 38 and it was too damn frustrating hitting someone and then hearing the bandage sound. Such a crappy bolt action rifle. At least the first one was more like an Enfield, and it is pretty good actually.
Type 38 is fine if you go for head shots.
Iceage 21 сен, 2013 @ 18:17 
Изначально опубликовано The Monkey King:
Изначально опубликовано Mahoney:
Type 99 is better. I remember playing with the 38 and it was too damn frustrating hitting someone and then hearing the bandage sound. Such a crappy bolt action rifle. At least the first one was more like an Enfield, and it is pretty good actually.
Type 38 is fine if you go for head shots.
Every weapon is fine if you go for headshots, especially in this game.
Angry Hobbit 21 сен, 2013 @ 18:31 
Изначально опубликовано Mahoney:
Изначально опубликовано The Monkey King:
Type 38 is fine if you go for head shots.
Every weapon is fine if you go for headshots, especially in this game.
Did I mention the type 38 also can be used as a walking stick, a spear and every type 38 is autographed by Hideki Tojo?
Последний раз отредактировал Angry Hobbit; 21 сен, 2013 @ 18:31
Iceage 21 сен, 2013 @ 18:33 
Изначально опубликовано The Monkey King:
Изначально опубликовано Mahoney:
Every weapon is fine if you go for headshots, especially in this game.
Did I mention the type 38 also can be used as a walking stick, a spear and every type 38 is autographed by Hideki Tojo?
Haha :P It also has better sights, but I prefer the 1 bullet = 1 empty chest type.
{sBc} SavageHenry 21 сен, 2013 @ 20:59 
m1carbine is garbage.
Leonardo 22 сен, 2013 @ 1:40 
In WW II, type 38 is a nice bolt-action rifle in Chinese front-line because of its much better workmanship than Chinese weapons. Japanese soldiers are good at maintain their weapons that Chines soldier especilly the ones fighting in enermy's occupied zone can get a much better rifle than they owns originally when they kill a Japanese soldier successfully. Even in 1960s, Chinese militia still equiped type 38.
Leonardo 22 сен, 2013 @ 1:47 
Изначально опубликовано Quincy Jones:
IMO the Type99 has significantly more damage. This also holds true for the MG's too. The type 38 uses the 6.5Arisaka, the Type99 uses the 7.7Arisaka. I think the 6.5 has a slightly flatter trajectory and faster flight, but it doesnt really matter that much, as the difference is only about 100fps, and the damage makes a bigger difference. I like the sights on both the type39 and 99 so that doesnt matter much to me, I think the 6.5 might chamber slightly faster as well.
No, 7.7Arisaka has the faster flight. 6.5Arisaka's muzzle velocity is about 740m/s when it's fired by type 38.
남자 22 сен, 2013 @ 3:59 
Type 99 is good.
Показано 115 из 16 комментариев
< >
На страницу: 15 30 50
Дата создания: 20 сен, 2013 @ 19:01
Сообщений: 16