Kisho 2013년 9월 20일 오후 7시 01분
Type 38 and Type 99
Which one is better ? I enjoy using them both and don't see the difference.
16개 중 1-15 표시중
< >
Moskeeto 2013년 9월 20일 오후 7시 02분 
It doesn't really matter. The Type 38 has a slightly more accurate flight path and the Type 99 has a slightly more powerful shot. It's really just up to which iron sight you prefer.
Sil.^ 2013년 9월 21일 오전 9시 03분 
I feel that the type 99 is better. Even though the type 38 has a nice iron sight. But thats just because sometimes I feel that that the type 38 often just harms the other player at longer ranges, whereas the type 99 is more powerful and seems to kill easier.
Quincy Jones 2013년 9월 21일 오전 9시 23분 
IMO the Type99 has significantly more damage. This also holds true for the MG's too. The type 38 uses the 6.5Arisaka, the Type99 uses the 7.7Arisaka. I think the 6.5 has a slightly flatter trajectory and faster flight, but it doesnt really matter that much, as the difference is only about 100fps, and the damage makes a bigger difference. I like the sights on both the type39 and 99 so that doesnt matter much to me, I think the 6.5 might chamber slightly faster as well.

Quincy Jones님이 마지막으로 수정; 2013년 9월 21일 오전 9시 24분
Gallows Humor. 2013년 9월 21일 오후 12시 21분 
Type 99 blocks my vision too much. I got used to the handling of the type 38 through knee mortar'ing.

needless to say, despite the M1 Carbine being a much better weapon, its sights makes it almost useless, especially if you have a pistol on you for close range fighting.
Whiskey_Fox 2013년 9월 21일 오후 5시 52분 
Y.O.B.A.님이 먼저 게시:
Type 99 blocks my vision too much. I got used to the handling of the type 38 through knee mortar'ing.

needless to say, despite the M1 Carbine being a much better weapon, its sights makes it almost useless, especially if you have a pistol on you for close range fighting.
My thoughts exactly on the type 38 and m1 Carbine
Beyond Human 2013년 9월 21일 오후 6시 14분 
Type 38 has better sights but the type 99 does more damage.
Beyond Human님이 마지막으로 수정; 2013년 9월 21일 오후 6시 15분
Edrisch 2013년 9월 21일 오후 6시 14분 
Type 99 is better. I remember playing with the 38 and it was too damn frustrating hitting someone and then hearing the bandage sound. Such a crappy bolt action rifle. At least the first one was more like an Enfield, and it is pretty good actually.
Beyond Human 2013년 9월 21일 오후 6시 15분 
Mahoney님이 먼저 게시:
Type 99 is better. I remember playing with the 38 and it was too damn frustrating hitting someone and then hearing the bandage sound. Such a crappy bolt action rifle. At least the first one was more like an Enfield, and it is pretty good actually.
Type 38 is fine if you go for head shots.
Edrisch 2013년 9월 21일 오후 6시 17분 
The Monkey King님이 먼저 게시:
Mahoney님이 먼저 게시:
Type 99 is better. I remember playing with the 38 and it was too damn frustrating hitting someone and then hearing the bandage sound. Such a crappy bolt action rifle. At least the first one was more like an Enfield, and it is pretty good actually.
Type 38 is fine if you go for head shots.
Every weapon is fine if you go for headshots, especially in this game.
Beyond Human 2013년 9월 21일 오후 6시 31분 
Mahoney님이 먼저 게시:
The Monkey King님이 먼저 게시:
Type 38 is fine if you go for head shots.
Every weapon is fine if you go for headshots, especially in this game.
Did I mention the type 38 also can be used as a walking stick, a spear and every type 38 is autographed by Hideki Tojo?
Beyond Human님이 마지막으로 수정; 2013년 9월 21일 오후 6시 31분
Edrisch 2013년 9월 21일 오후 6시 33분 
The Monkey King님이 먼저 게시:
Mahoney님이 먼저 게시:
Every weapon is fine if you go for headshots, especially in this game.
Did I mention the type 38 also can be used as a walking stick, a spear and every type 38 is autographed by Hideki Tojo?
Haha :P It also has better sights, but I prefer the 1 bullet = 1 empty chest type.
SavageHenry 2013년 9월 21일 오후 8시 59분 
m1carbine is garbage.
Leonardo 2013년 9월 22일 오전 1시 40분 
In WW II, type 38 is a nice bolt-action rifle in Chinese front-line because of its much better workmanship than Chinese weapons. Japanese soldiers are good at maintain their weapons that Chines soldier especilly the ones fighting in enermy's occupied zone can get a much better rifle than they owns originally when they kill a Japanese soldier successfully. Even in 1960s, Chinese militia still equiped type 38.
Leonardo 2013년 9월 22일 오전 1시 47분 
Quincy Jones님이 먼저 게시:
IMO the Type99 has significantly more damage. This also holds true for the MG's too. The type 38 uses the 6.5Arisaka, the Type99 uses the 7.7Arisaka. I think the 6.5 has a slightly flatter trajectory and faster flight, but it doesnt really matter that much, as the difference is only about 100fps, and the damage makes a bigger difference. I like the sights on both the type39 and 99 so that doesnt matter much to me, I think the 6.5 might chamber slightly faster as well.
No, 7.7Arisaka has the faster flight. 6.5Arisaka's muzzle velocity is about 740m/s when it's fired by type 38.
남자 2013년 9월 22일 오전 3시 59분 
Type 99 is good.
16개 중 1-15 표시중
< >
페이지당: 15 30 50
게시된 날짜: 2013년 9월 20일 오후 7시 01분
게시글: 16