Kisho 2013年9月20日 19時01分
Type 38 and Type 99
Which one is better ? I enjoy using them both and don't see the difference.
1-15 / 16 のコメントを表示
< >
Moskeeto 2013年9月20日 19時02分 
It doesn't really matter. The Type 38 has a slightly more accurate flight path and the Type 99 has a slightly more powerful shot. It's really just up to which iron sight you prefer.
Sil.^ 2013年9月21日 9時03分 
I feel that the type 99 is better. Even though the type 38 has a nice iron sight. But thats just because sometimes I feel that that the type 38 often just harms the other player at longer ranges, whereas the type 99 is more powerful and seems to kill easier.
Quincy Jones 2013年9月21日 9時23分 
IMO the Type99 has significantly more damage. This also holds true for the MG's too. The type 38 uses the 6.5Arisaka, the Type99 uses the 7.7Arisaka. I think the 6.5 has a slightly flatter trajectory and faster flight, but it doesnt really matter that much, as the difference is only about 100fps, and the damage makes a bigger difference. I like the sights on both the type39 and 99 so that doesnt matter much to me, I think the 6.5 might chamber slightly faster as well.

最近の変更はQuincy Jonesが行いました; 2013年9月21日 9時24分
Mr. Internet Troll 2013年9月21日 12時21分 
Type 99 blocks my vision too much. I got used to the handling of the type 38 through knee mortar'ing.

needless to say, despite the M1 Carbine being a much better weapon, its sights makes it almost useless, especially if you have a pistol on you for close range fighting.
<{.:[Hellfire]:.}>Odyssey-☭RUS 2013年9月21日 17時52分 
Y.O.B.A. の投稿を引用:
Type 99 blocks my vision too much. I got used to the handling of the type 38 through knee mortar'ing.

needless to say, despite the M1 Carbine being a much better weapon, its sights makes it almost useless, especially if you have a pistol on you for close range fighting.
My thoughts exactly on the type 38 and m1 Carbine
Beyond Human 2013年9月21日 18時14分 
Type 38 has better sights but the type 99 does more damage.
最近の変更はBeyond Humanが行いました; 2013年9月21日 18時15分
Kc 2013年9月21日 18時14分 
Type 99 is better. I remember playing with the 38 and it was too damn frustrating hitting someone and then hearing the bandage sound. Such a crappy bolt action rifle. At least the first one was more like an Enfield, and it is pretty good actually.
Beyond Human 2013年9月21日 18時15分 
Mahoney の投稿を引用:
Type 99 is better. I remember playing with the 38 and it was too damn frustrating hitting someone and then hearing the bandage sound. Such a crappy bolt action rifle. At least the first one was more like an Enfield, and it is pretty good actually.
Type 38 is fine if you go for head shots.
Kc 2013年9月21日 18時17分 
The Monkey King の投稿を引用:
Mahoney の投稿を引用:
Type 99 is better. I remember playing with the 38 and it was too damn frustrating hitting someone and then hearing the bandage sound. Such a crappy bolt action rifle. At least the first one was more like an Enfield, and it is pretty good actually.
Type 38 is fine if you go for head shots.
Every weapon is fine if you go for headshots, especially in this game.
Beyond Human 2013年9月21日 18時31分 
Mahoney の投稿を引用:
The Monkey King の投稿を引用:
Type 38 is fine if you go for head shots.
Every weapon is fine if you go for headshots, especially in this game.
Did I mention the type 38 also can be used as a walking stick, a spear and every type 38 is autographed by Hideki Tojo?
最近の変更はBeyond Humanが行いました; 2013年9月21日 18時31分
Kc 2013年9月21日 18時33分 
The Monkey King の投稿を引用:
Mahoney の投稿を引用:
Every weapon is fine if you go for headshots, especially in this game.
Did I mention the type 38 also can be used as a walking stick, a spear and every type 38 is autographed by Hideki Tojo?
Haha :P It also has better sights, but I prefer the 1 bullet = 1 empty chest type.
Thulsa 2013年9月21日 20時59分 
m1carbine is garbage.
Leonardo 2013年9月22日 1時40分 
In WW II, type 38 is a nice bolt-action rifle in Chinese front-line because of its much better workmanship than Chinese weapons. Japanese soldiers are good at maintain their weapons that Chines soldier especilly the ones fighting in enermy's occupied zone can get a much better rifle than they owns originally when they kill a Japanese soldier successfully. Even in 1960s, Chinese militia still equiped type 38.
Leonardo 2013年9月22日 1時47分 
Quincy Jones の投稿を引用:
IMO the Type99 has significantly more damage. This also holds true for the MG's too. The type 38 uses the 6.5Arisaka, the Type99 uses the 7.7Arisaka. I think the 6.5 has a slightly flatter trajectory and faster flight, but it doesnt really matter that much, as the difference is only about 100fps, and the damage makes a bigger difference. I like the sights on both the type39 and 99 so that doesnt matter much to me, I think the 6.5 might chamber slightly faster as well.
No, 7.7Arisaka has the faster flight. 6.5Arisaka's muzzle velocity is about 740m/s when it's fired by type 38.
헿으헿 2013年9月22日 3時59分 
Type 99 is good.
1-15 / 16 のコメントを表示
< >
ページ毎: 15 30 50
投稿日: 2013年9月20日 19時01分
投稿数: 16