Kisho 20. syys, 2013 19.01
Type 38 and Type 99
Which one is better ? I enjoy using them both and don't see the difference.
Näytetään 1-15 / 16 kommentista
< >
Moskeeto 20. syys, 2013 19.02 
It doesn't really matter. The Type 38 has a slightly more accurate flight path and the Type 99 has a slightly more powerful shot. It's really just up to which iron sight you prefer.
Sil. 21. syys, 2013 9.03 
I feel that the type 99 is better. Even though the type 38 has a nice iron sight. But thats just because sometimes I feel that that the type 38 often just harms the other player at longer ranges, whereas the type 99 is more powerful and seems to kill easier.
Quincy Jones 21. syys, 2013 9.23 
IMO the Type99 has significantly more damage. This also holds true for the MG's too. The type 38 uses the 6.5Arisaka, the Type99 uses the 7.7Arisaka. I think the 6.5 has a slightly flatter trajectory and faster flight, but it doesnt really matter that much, as the difference is only about 100fps, and the damage makes a bigger difference. I like the sights on both the type39 and 99 so that doesnt matter much to me, I think the 6.5 might chamber slightly faster as well.

Viimeisin muokkaaja on Quincy Jones; 21. syys, 2013 9.24
Al - Kahalic 21. syys, 2013 12.21 
Type 99 blocks my vision too much. I got used to the handling of the type 38 through knee mortar'ing.

needless to say, despite the M1 Carbine being a much better weapon, its sights makes it almost useless, especially if you have a pistol on you for close range fighting.
<{.:[Hellfire]:.}>Odyssey-☭RUS 21. syys, 2013 17.52 
Y.O.B.A. lähetti viestin:
Type 99 blocks my vision too much. I got used to the handling of the type 38 through knee mortar'ing.

needless to say, despite the M1 Carbine being a much better weapon, its sights makes it almost useless, especially if you have a pistol on you for close range fighting.
My thoughts exactly on the type 38 and m1 Carbine
Beyond Human 21. syys, 2013 18.14 
Type 38 has better sights but the type 99 does more damage.
Viimeisin muokkaaja on Beyond Human; 21. syys, 2013 18.15
Kc 21. syys, 2013 18.14 
Type 99 is better. I remember playing with the 38 and it was too damn frustrating hitting someone and then hearing the bandage sound. Such a crappy bolt action rifle. At least the first one was more like an Enfield, and it is pretty good actually.
Beyond Human 21. syys, 2013 18.15 
Mahoney lähetti viestin:
Type 99 is better. I remember playing with the 38 and it was too damn frustrating hitting someone and then hearing the bandage sound. Such a crappy bolt action rifle. At least the first one was more like an Enfield, and it is pretty good actually.
Type 38 is fine if you go for head shots.
Kc 21. syys, 2013 18.17 
The Monkey King lähetti viestin:
Mahoney lähetti viestin:
Type 99 is better. I remember playing with the 38 and it was too damn frustrating hitting someone and then hearing the bandage sound. Such a crappy bolt action rifle. At least the first one was more like an Enfield, and it is pretty good actually.
Type 38 is fine if you go for head shots.
Every weapon is fine if you go for headshots, especially in this game.
Beyond Human 21. syys, 2013 18.31 
Mahoney lähetti viestin:
The Monkey King lähetti viestin:
Type 38 is fine if you go for head shots.
Every weapon is fine if you go for headshots, especially in this game.
Did I mention the type 38 also can be used as a walking stick, a spear and every type 38 is autographed by Hideki Tojo?
Viimeisin muokkaaja on Beyond Human; 21. syys, 2013 18.31
Kc 21. syys, 2013 18.33 
The Monkey King lähetti viestin:
Mahoney lähetti viestin:
Every weapon is fine if you go for headshots, especially in this game.
Did I mention the type 38 also can be used as a walking stick, a spear and every type 38 is autographed by Hideki Tojo?
Haha :P It also has better sights, but I prefer the 1 bullet = 1 empty chest type.
Thulsa 21. syys, 2013 20.59 
m1carbine is garbage.
Leonardo 22. syys, 2013 1.40 
In WW II, type 38 is a nice bolt-action rifle in Chinese front-line because of its much better workmanship than Chinese weapons. Japanese soldiers are good at maintain their weapons that Chines soldier especilly the ones fighting in enermy's occupied zone can get a much better rifle than they owns originally when they kill a Japanese soldier successfully. Even in 1960s, Chinese militia still equiped type 38.
Leonardo 22. syys, 2013 1.47 
Quincy Jones lähetti viestin:
IMO the Type99 has significantly more damage. This also holds true for the MG's too. The type 38 uses the 6.5Arisaka, the Type99 uses the 7.7Arisaka. I think the 6.5 has a slightly flatter trajectory and faster flight, but it doesnt really matter that much, as the difference is only about 100fps, and the damage makes a bigger difference. I like the sights on both the type39 and 99 so that doesnt matter much to me, I think the 6.5 might chamber slightly faster as well.
No, 7.7Arisaka has the faster flight. 6.5Arisaka's muzzle velocity is about 740m/s when it's fired by type 38.
헿으헿 22. syys, 2013 3.59 
Type 99 is good.
Näytetään 1-15 / 16 kommentista
< >
Sivua kohden: 15 30 50
Lähetetty: 20. syys, 2013 19.01
Viestejä: 16