安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
aham you whant iron man suit ......
A quote from the wiki:
Actually, i think the flamer should be less lethal, unless your hit directly in the face (and you dont cover up with your arms) it should not take you down instantly, thus giving a chance for the japanase soldier to hug a enemy and try to take him down with him.
4 How exacly do you want to be less visible? Your carrying a fuel storage in your back, thats the downside of being the flamer, your a target of oportunity.
5 As far as i know, troops that used the flamethrower did not had any armor in real life and even if they did, it would be conflicting with your Number 1 request, since armor would surely slow you down.
Not gonna comment on 6, also i find your "the Axis are always crying like little communist girls" quite racist against the japanese, what exacly do want to imply?
Honestly, the flamethrower is quite powerful as it is, if your having a problem with it, its either you or your team.
Rly nice answears. +rep
1. It can hit and instantkill players, even if the flames don't even touch them. I've seen flamethrowers being used uphill (i.e. guadacanal) and people behind the hill were killed even though flames pass ABOVE them and not even hitting them (and no, the flames didn't hit a tree or similar to make them change direction).
2. Flamethrower shouldn't instantkill. People hit by flames should still have a second or two to actually fire off a shot or similar. Very often while charging with bayonette the flames barely touch you and then instantkill you.. even if you are right in the face of the enemy and about to release the stab.
Sure, flamethrowers do need to be effective due to their reduced movement speed, larger profile due to the tank and the relatively short range.
However, in current form they are too effective, especially due to the above two reasons.
I just laughed a little. On that note, if anyone took this post for serious after actually reading the post, then shame on you. And shame on anyone who did not read and still posted.
lol, well at least someone got it. I just got tired seeing all the 'flamethrowers are so overpowered' threads. Amazed at how many people gave me a serious reply though.
Please watch Iron Man for historical reference on the armored flame throwers. That guy can go fast as ♥♥♥♥!
1. Flames passing above a player would catch someone in real life as the napalm rains down on them.
2.The dev has stated several times that death isn't really death but the point when you become combat ineffective is when you die. I can catch on fire for like 2 seconds then you die in this game even though you're not really dead IRL you would be rolling on the ground and combat ineffective.