Fanda Nyamo 1月20日下午3:08
How to describe a mission featuring the atomic bomb...
Just imagine a 1000 ingame flamethrowers, then we have it.
最后由 Fanda Nyamo 编辑于; 1月21日下午1:17
正在显示第 1 - 6 条,共 6 条留言
< >
PFC Jergulson [29th ID] 1月20日下午10:52 
I think you are off by several orders of magnitude. Even for the small nuclear weapons of wwii :)
droggen 1月21日上午12:35 
Boy that would be a boring map for japan you just sit in a corner camping a door untill the allies auto win.
Crystal 1月21日上午1:42 
If the flamer was really how we have it in game i think weapon progress would stop and in all countries people in infantry used flamers only.
最后由 Crystal 编辑于; 1月21日上午1:42
MeFirst 1月21日上午1:54 
Not really. Flamethrowers are very limited in use. In the game they are not that much limited because you are faster, the distances are shorter and you dont have to be afraid of dying because you respawn. However I dont get when people complain a lot about the flamer. Also in the game it is a 100% hit or miss weapon. Depending on the situation in the game it is the perfect or the most horrible weapon you can have in your hands.
Fanda Nyamo 1月21日上午9:39 
This post was just meant as a joke for a few lols.
Crystal 1月21日下午1:16 
Lol exactly as i said i think that flamer is much better then in real life lol.
正在显示第 1 - 6 条,共 6 条留言
< >
每页显示数: 15 30 50
发帖日期: 1月20日下午3:08
帖子数: 6