Fanda Nyamo 20 ian. @ 3:08pm
How to describe a mission featuring the atomic bomb...
Just imagine a 1000 ingame flamethrowers, then we have it.
Editat ultima dată de Fanda Nyamo; 21 ian. @ 1:17pm
Afişate 1-6 din 6 de comentarii
< >
PFC Jergulson [29ID] 20 ian. @ 10:52pm 
I think you are off by several orders of magnitude. Even for the small nuclear weapons of wwii :)
droggen 21 ian. @ 12:35am 
Boy that would be a boring map for japan you just sit in a corner camping a door untill the allies auto win.
Crystal 21 ian. @ 1:42am 
If the flamer was really how we have it in game i think weapon progress would stop and in all countries people in infantry used flamers only.
Editat ultima dată de Crystal; 21 ian. @ 1:42am
MeFirst 21 ian. @ 1:54am 
Not really. Flamethrowers are very limited in use. In the game they are not that much limited because you are faster, the distances are shorter and you dont have to be afraid of dying because you respawn. However I dont get when people complain a lot about the flamer. Also in the game it is a 100% hit or miss weapon. Depending on the situation in the game it is the perfect or the most horrible weapon you can have in your hands.
Fanda Nyamo 21 ian. @ 9:39am 
This post was just meant as a joke for a few lols.
Crystal 21 ian. @ 1:16pm 
Lol exactly as i said i think that flamer is much better then in real life lol.
Afişate 1-6 din 6 de comentarii
< >
Per pagină: 15 30 50
Data publicării: 20 ian. @ 3:08pm
Mesaje: 6