Fanda Nyamo 20 Jan às 15:08
How to describe a mission featuring the atomic bomb...
Just imagine a 1000 ingame flamethrowers, then we have it.
Última alteração por Fanda Nyamo; 21 Jan às 13:17
A mostrar 1-6 de 6 comentários
< >
PFC Jergulson [29ID] 20 Jan às 22:52 
I think you are off by several orders of magnitude. Even for the small nuclear weapons of wwii :)
droggen 21 Jan às 0:35 
Boy that would be a boring map for japan you just sit in a corner camping a door untill the allies auto win.
Crystal 21 Jan às 1:42 
If the flamer was really how we have it in game i think weapon progress would stop and in all countries people in infantry used flamers only.
Última alteração por Crystal; 21 Jan às 1:42
MeFirst 21 Jan às 1:54 
Not really. Flamethrowers are very limited in use. In the game they are not that much limited because you are faster, the distances are shorter and you dont have to be afraid of dying because you respawn. However I dont get when people complain a lot about the flamer. Also in the game it is a 100% hit or miss weapon. Depending on the situation in the game it is the perfect or the most horrible weapon you can have in your hands.
Fanda Nyamo 21 Jan às 9:39 
This post was just meant as a joke for a few lols.
Crystal 21 Jan às 13:16 
Lol exactly as i said i think that flamer is much better then in real life lol.
A mostrar 1-6 de 6 comentários
< >
Por página: 15 30 50
Postado a: 20 Jan às 15:08
Comentários: 6